Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
External Validity of Contingent Valuation: Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments
Mandy Ryan1, Emmanouil Mentzakis2, Suthi Jareinpituk3
1Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health, Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
None:
Whilst contingent valuation is increasingly used in economics to value benefits, questions remain concerning its external validity that is do hypothetical responses match actual responses? We present results from the first within sample field test. Whilst Hypothetical No is always an Actual No, Hypothetical Yes exceed Actual Yes responses. A constant rate of response reversals across bids/prices could suggest theoretically consistent option value responses. Certainty calibrations (verbal and numerical response scales) minimise hypothetical-actual discrepancies offering a useful solution. Helping respondents resolve uncertainty may reduce the discrepancy between hypothetical and actual payments and thus lead to more accurate policy recommendations. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Naturalistic Observations
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Expected Value
Statistical Significance
Social Exchange Theory

