Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Isolation and Identification of Waterborne Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Molecular Characterization of their Antibiotic Resistance Genes
Published on: March 3, 2023
Identification of the Bacterial Reservoirs for the Middle Ear Using Phylogenic Analysis
Chun Ling Chan1, David Wabnitz2, Ahmed Bassiouni1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.
Importance:
The adenoid pad has long been considered a reservoir for bacteria in the pathogenesis of otitis media with effusion (OME). However, bacteria more reminiscent of external auditory canal (EAC) commensals are often demonstrated within middle ear aspirates.
Objective:
To compare the microbiota of the EAC, the middle ear with OME, and the adenoid pad to further clarify the true source of middle ear bacteria.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
Middle ear fluid (MEF) aspirates and EAC lavages were collected from 18 children with OME undergoing ventilation tube insertion from June 1, 2014, to August 31, 2015, at Women and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. Adenoid pad and MEF samples were included from a previous study. Samples were analyzed using sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Previously collected microbiota data from the adenoid pad were collated for analysis.
Main Outcome Measures:
Mean relative abundance of top bacterial genera for the MEF, EAC, and adenoid pad samples.
Results:
Eighteen pediatric patients with chronic OME (6 female; 12 male; mean [SD] age, 48 [36] months) were recruited prospectively, with 34 paired MEF and EAC samples. The MEF microbiota (mean relative abundance [SD]) consisted of Alloiococcus otitidis (37.5% [40.0%]), Haemophilus (14.4% [29.1%]), Moraxella (10.0% [26.4%]), Staphylococcus (8.2% [21.9%]), and Streptococcus (3.8% [13.1%]). The mean relative abundance (SD) microbiota of the EAC demonstrated a sparsity of classic otopathogens, including Haemophilus (0.3% [0.8%]), Moraxella (0.3% [0.7%]), and Streptococcus (0.2% [0.6%]), but had a high abundance of Alloiococcus (58.0% [44.1%]), Staphylococcus (20.8% [34.0%]), and Pseudomonas (3.2% [17.1%]). In contrast, based on previously collected data, the microbiota of the adenoid pad showed a high abundance of the classic otopathogens with a sparsity of EAC genera for Alloiococcus (0.1% vs 28.9%, respectively; P < .001), Haemophilus (25.2% vs 18.2%, respectively; P = .002), Staphylococcus (0.2% vs 10.8%, respectively; P = .02), Streptococcus (12.7% vs 4.2%, respectively; P < .001), and Pseudomonas (0 vs 2.1% respectively; P < .001). The microbiota of the MEF collected during 2 consecutive years were similar (Alloiococcus, 22.7% vs 37.5%; Haemophilus, 22.5% vs 14.0%; Staphylococcus, 10.9% vs 10.7%; Moraxella, 5.0% vs 9.7%; Corynebacteria, 6.2% vs 3.1%; Streptococcus, 4.8% vs 3.7%; and Pseudomonas, 1.1% vs 3.0%; P ≥ .05).
Conclusions And Relevance:
The EAC and the nasopharynx could serve as reservoirs for microbiota of the middle ear. Furthermore, the microbiota of the middle ear with effusion appear to be relatively stable over time and between populations with OME.
Insights
The external auditory canal (EAC) and nasopharynx, not the adenoid pad, may be reservoirs for middle ear bacteria in otitis media with effusion (OME). Middle ear fluid microbiota are stable over time in OME patients.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Background:
- The adenoid pad is traditionally considered a bacterial reservoir contributing to otitis media with effusion (OME).
- However, middle ear aspirates often contain bacteria resembling external auditory canal (EAC) commensals, questioning the adenoid's role.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the microbial communities of the EAC, middle ear fluid (MEF) in OME, and the adenoid pad.
- To identify the primary source of bacteria implicated in the pathogenesis of OME.
Main Methods:
- 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing was used to analyze MEF aspirates and EAC lavages from 18 children with OME.
- Microbiota data from adenoid pad samples, collected previously, were included for comparative analysis.
Main Results:
- The MEF microbiota were dominated by Alloiococcus otitidis, Haemophilus, and Moraxella.
- The EAC microbiota showed high abundance of Alloiococcus and Staphylococcus, with a scarcity of classic otopathogens.
- The adenoid pad microbiota exhibited a high prevalence of otopathogens like Haemophilus and Streptococcus, unlike the EAC and MEF.
Conclusions:
- The EAC and nasopharynx, rather than the adenoid pad, are likely reservoirs for middle ear bacteria in OME.
- The microbial composition of middle ear fluid in OME appears consistent over time and across different patient groups.
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Methods of Classification and Identification
Applications of Molecular Taxonomy
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Bacterial Phylum Actinobacteria

