Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

07:58
Use of Image Cytometry for Quantification of Pathogenic Fungi in Association with Host Cells
Published on: June 19, 2013
13.5K
Current Algorithms in Fungal Diagnosis in the Immunocompromised Host
Thomas Lehrnbecher1, Karsten Becker2, Andreas H Groll3
1Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt, 60590, Germany. Thomas.Lehrnbecher@kgu.de.
Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|November 13, 2016
Summary
Diagnosing invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in immunocompromised patients requires a combination of methods. Early detection using non-culture based assays and imaging aids clinical decisions, but definitive diagnosis relies on invasive procedures.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Infectious Diseases
- Immunocompromised Host Management
Background:
- Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) significantly increase morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with hematological malignancies or undergoing stem cell transplantation.
- Nonspecific clinical presentations of IFDs in this vulnerable population complicate early and accurate diagnosis.
- Definitive diagnosis of IFDs typically necessitates invasive procedures, posing challenges in timely management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current knowledge and diagnostic tools for invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in immunocompromised patients.
- To provide practical guidance on utilizing various diagnostic approaches for IFD management.
- To highlight the role of noninvasive and imaging techniques in complementing definitive diagnostic methods.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and diagnostic guidelines for IFDs.
- Discussion of culture-based methods, including specific media and microscopic examination.
- Evaluation of non-culture based assays (e.g., galactomannan, beta-D-glucan) and molecular tools (e.g., PCR).
- Assessment of the utility of imaging studies in the diagnosis of IFDs.
- Emphasis on the importance of invasive diagnostic procedures (e.g., bronchoalveolar lavage, biopsy) for pathogen identification.
Main Results:
- Culture and microscopy remain essential for definitive IFD diagnosis, requiring optimized techniques for sensitivity.
- Non-culture based assays and molecular methods offer potential for earlier detection and support clinical decision-making.
- Imaging modalities can suggest IFD but are not sufficient for etiological confirmation.
- Invasive diagnostic procedures are crucial for identifying the causative fungal pathogen and guiding therapy.
Conclusions:
- A multifaceted diagnostic approach combining noninvasive assays, imaging, and definitive invasive procedures is critical for managing IFDs in immunocompromised patients.
- Optimized laboratory techniques and judicious use of diagnostic tools can improve the timely diagnosis and management of IFDs.
- Further research into novel diagnostic strategies may enhance early detection and improve outcomes for patients at risk of IFDs.
Keywords:
BiopsyBrochoalveolar lavageComputerized tomographyCultureGalactomannanInvasive fungal diseaseMagnetic resonance imagingPolymerase chain reactionß-d-glucan
