Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Robust Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis: Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of dependent effect sizes.

Behavior research methods·2026

Same author

A finely annotated dataset for the automated acoustic identification of European Orthoptera and Cicadidae.

Scientific data·2026

Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026

Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026

Same author

Continuous outcome estimation in N-of-1 trials for accelerated decision-making.

Epilepsia·2026

Same author

Evolution of Large Polymorphic Inversions in a Panmictic Songbird.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025

Same journal

Animal empathy reconsidered: a multidimensional profile account.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026

Same journal

Dynamic molecular networks unveil the mechanism behind hypoxia-induced tumour cell dormancy.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026

Same journal

Kin discrimination in plants: overview and implications for population and community ecology.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026

Same journal

Review of the fauna associated with wild and farmed mussels and oysters in the Mediterranean.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026

Same journal

What drives animal responses to high severity fire? The role of functional traits.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026

Same journal

Partners or passengers? Revisiting the association between diatoms and aquatic animals.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide.

Wolfgang Forstmeier¹, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers², Timothy H Parker³

¹Department of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319 Seewiesen, Germany.

Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

|November 24, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A growing concern in research is the inability to replicate findings, often due to a bias towards publishing significant effects. This study reviews practices that increase false positives and proposes solutions for more rigorous, objective science.

Keywords:

HARKing P-hacking Type I error confirmation bias hindsight bias overfitting power preregistration replication researcher degrees of freedom

More Related Videos

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids

Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids

Published on: June 8, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids

Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids

Published on: June 8, 2019

Area of Science:

Scientific methodology
Research integrity
Publication bias

Background:

Growing concern over the replicability of published research findings.
Current scientific culture may favor publishing significant effects over null findings.
This bias can compromise meta-analyses and hinder falsification of hypotheses.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify sources of error contributing to false-positive conclusions in research.
To review current scientific practices and their impact on research reliability.
To propose solutions for enhancing scientific objectivity and rigor.

Main Methods:

Review of current scientific practices and their statistical implications.
Analysis of factors contributing to false-positive findings.
Examination of statistical pitfalls and psychological traps in research.

Main Results:

False-positive rates increase with smaller sample sizes, pursuit of novelty, multiple testing, and incorrect P-values (e.g., pseudoreplication).
Statistical and psychological factors can lead to biased and unreliable conclusions.
Specific practices exacerbate the problem of irreproducible research.

Conclusions:

Promoting a culture of publishing rigorous studies is essential.
Strategies include preregistering studies, blinding during data collection/analysis, and reporting all results.
Shifting evaluation criteria towards scientific rigor over impact metrics is recommended.