Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 11, 2026

Atom Probe Tomography Analysis of Exsolved Mineral Phases
Published on: October 25, 2019
Two cubic phases in kimzeyite garnet from the type locality Magnet Cove, Arkansas
Sytle M Antao1, Laura A Cruickshank1
1Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
Abstract:
The crystal structure of an optically anisotropic kimzeyite garnet from Magnet Cove, Arkansas, USA, where it was first discovered, was refined with the Rietveld method, cubic space group, Ia\overline 3 d, and monochromatic [λ = 0.41422 (2) Å] synchrotron high-resolution powder X-ray diffraction (HRPXRD) data. The Rietveld refinement reduced χ2 and overall R(F2) values are 1.840 and 0.0647, respectively. The sample, with the general garnet formula [8]X3[6]Y2[4]Z3[4]O12, contains an intergrowth of two cubic phases that occur initially as oscillatory growth zoning, and patchy intergrowths arise later from fluid-enhanced dissolution and re-precipitation. The two compositions obtained with electron-probe microanalyses (EPMA) are Ca3.00(Zr1.31Ti4+0.46Fe3+0.22Mn3+0.01)∑2[Al0.76Fe3+1.01Si1.23]∑3O12 for phase 1a and Ca2.99(Zr1.48Ti4+0.37Fe3+0.15)∑2[Al0.87Fe3+0.98Si1.15]∑3O12 for phase 1b. The weight percentage, unit-cell parameter (Å), distances (Å), and site occupancy factors (s.o.f.s) for phase 1a are as follows: 42.6 (2)%, a = 12.46553 (3) Å, average 〈X-O〉 = 2.482, Y-O = 2.059 (2), Z-O = 1.761 (2) Å, Ca (X s.o.f.) = 0.960 (4), Zr (Y s.o.f.) = 0.809 (3), and Fe (Z s.o.f.) = 0.623 (2). The corresponding values for phase 1b are 57.4 (2)%, a = 12.47691 (2) Å, average 〈X-O〉 = 2.482, Y-O = 2.062 (1), Z-O = 1.762 (1) Å, Ca (X s.o.f.) = 0.957 (3), Zr (Y s.o.f.) = 0.828 (2) and Fe (Z s.o.f.) = 0.617 (2). The main structural differences between the two phases are in the unit-cell parameter, Δa = 0.01138 Å, Y(s.o.f.), and Y-O distance. Structural mismatch between the two cubic phases in a crystal gives rise to strain-induced optical anisotropy.
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Phase Diagram
Phase Diagram
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Phase Diagrams
Phase Transitions: Sublimation and Deposition

