You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Best Current Practice for Obtaining High Quality EEG Data During Simultaneous fMRI
Published on: June 3, 2013
César Caballero-Gaudes1, Richard C Reynolds2
1Basque Center of Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian, Spain.
This review examines various techniques used to remove unwanted noise from brain imaging data. It explains how researchers can isolate true neuronal activity from physiological and instrumental interference to improve study accuracy.
Area of Science:
Background:
No prior work has fully synthesized the diverse strategies available for isolating neural signals from complex imaging data. Researchers frequently struggle to distinguish genuine brain activity from various non-neuronal artifacts. This uncertainty drove the need for a systematic evaluation of current denoising practices. Prior research has shown that blood oxygen-level-dependent signals are inherently indirect measures of brain function. These signals often contain significant interference from vascular and metabolic sources. Such corruption complicates the interpretation of functional brain maps across different subject populations. That gap motivated this comprehensive examination of existing signal cleaning frameworks. Investigators require clear guidance on selecting appropriate tools to mitigate these pervasive data quality issues.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of existing methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal. Researchers face a specific problem where the blood oxygen-level-dependent signal is severely corrupted by non-neuronal fluctuations. These fluctuations originate from instrumental, physiological, or subject-specific sources. This motivation stems from the need to improve the accuracy of brain function investigations in healthy individuals and patients. The authors focus on the methodological operation of different techniques to assist practitioners in their selection. They specifically address the advantages and limitations of various approaches to ensure informed application. By summarizing these strategies, the study seeks to clarify the best practices for signal denoising. This work provides a necessary foundation for researchers aiming to enhance the quality of their functional imaging data.
Main Methods:
Review approach involves a systematic categorization of signal cleaning techniques based on their underlying operational principles. The authors evaluate strategies by focusing on their specific advantages and inherent limitations in practical applications. This analysis covers both data-driven frameworks and methods that rely on external physiological recordings. The investigators examine how decomposition tools like principal component analysis function to isolate noise. They also assess the utility of independent component analysis for separating mixed signal sources. The review approach includes a critical look at how phase-based information and multi-echo acquisitions contribute to data refinement. Furthermore, the authors investigate the role of global signal regression within standard preprocessing pipelines. This structured evaluation provides a methodological roadmap for researchers seeking to optimize their imaging workflows.
Main Results:
Key findings from the literature indicate that blood oxygen-level-dependent signals are heavily influenced by a mixture of vascular, metabolic, and instrumental processes. The authors report that motion-related fluctuations and physiological noise represent the two most significant components requiring removal. Data-driven approaches demonstrate high utility because they do not rely on rigid assumptions about the noise model. Principal and independent component analysis emerge as effective tools for simultaneously reducing multiple types of signal interference. The literature suggests that incorporating phase information or multi-echo data significantly improves the ability to distinguish noise from neural activity. Global signal regression is identified as a common but complex strategy for denoising that warrants careful application. The authors find that optimizing the preprocessing pipeline is essential for both task-based and resting-state studies. Finally, the review confirms that signal cleaning is a critical step for ensuring the validity of functional brain investigations.
Conclusions:
The authors suggest that effective noise removal remains a prerequisite for reliable functional imaging analysis. They propose that researchers must carefully balance the benefits and limitations of various denoising strategies. Synthesis and implications indicate that data-driven techniques offer flexibility when specific noise models are unavailable. The review highlights that incorporating phase information or multi-echo data can significantly enhance signal quality. Authors note that global signal regression remains a debated but frequently utilized tool for artifact reduction. They emphasize that optimizing preprocessing pipelines is necessary for both task-based and resting-state investigations. Future efforts should focus on refining these methods to better isolate neuronal responses from physiological fluctuations. The researchers conclude that standardized denoising workflows will improve the reproducibility of findings across the neuroimaging field.
The researchers propose that denoising improves signal quality by isolating neuronal activity from non-neuronal fluctuations. This process involves mitigating instrumental, physiological, and subject-specific artifacts that otherwise corrupt the indirect blood oxygen-level-dependent measurements.
Data-driven approaches, such as principal and independent component analysis, are highlighted by the authors. These methods are preferred when researchers lack specific models for the noise, allowing for the simultaneous reduction of multiple types of signal fluctuations.
The authors suggest that external recordings are necessary when targeting specific physiological noise components, such as cardiac or respiratory cycles, which otherwise contaminate the signal and obscure true neuronal responses.
The authors explain that phase information and multi-echo data provide additional dimensions for signal separation. These components allow for a more precise identification of noise versus true neural activity compared to standard magnitude-only imaging.
The researchers discuss global signal regression as a technique for denoising. While it is a common strategy, they note that its application requires careful consideration due to ongoing debates regarding its impact on the underlying neural signal.
The authors state that denoising is a prerequisite for both task-based and resting-state studies. They imply that without these cleaning steps, the resulting functional maps may lead to inaccurate interpretations of brain activity.