Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Evaluating the Effect of Roadside Parking on a Dual-Direction Urban Street
Published on: January 20, 2023
Finite mixture modeling approach for developing crash modification factors in highway safety analysis
Byung-Jung Park1, Dominique Lord2, Lingtao Wu3
1Department of Transportation Engineering, Myongji University, Republic of Korea.
The two-component finite mixture of negative binomial (FMNB-2) model offers superior crash modification factors (CMFs) compared to the negative binomial (NB) model. FMNB-2 better reflects covariate effects and nonlinear relationships for improved highway safety analysis.
Area of Science:
- Transportation Engineering
- Traffic Safety Analysis
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) are crucial for evaluating the safety impact of highway design and operational changes.
- Traditional models like the negative binomial (NB) may not fully capture the complexity of crash frequency data.
- The two-component finite mixture of negative binomial (FMNB-2) model offers a potential improvement for modeling crash data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of the NB model and the FMNB-2 model in developing CMFs.
- To derive and evaluate crash modification functions (CMFunctions) from both models.
- To assess the accuracy of combined CMFs and Adjustment Factors (AFs) derived from the FMNB-2 model.
Main Methods:
- Modeling crash data from rural multilane divided highways in California and Texas using both NB and FMNB-2 models.
- Deriving CMFunctions from the fitted models to represent the safety effects of covariates.
- Estimating combined CMFs for multiple treatments and developing AFs.
Main Results:
- The FMNB-2 model's CMFunction better reflects covariate effects and captures nonlinear relationships between covariates and safety.
- Combined CMFs derived from the FMNB-2 model are not simply multiplicative, indicating dependent safety effects.
- Adjustment Factors developed using the FMNB-2 model highlight potential over- or under-estimation by current Highway Safety Manual methods.
Conclusions:
- The FMNB-2 model provides a more robust framework for developing CMFs and AFs compared to the NB model.
- Safety analysts should consider utilizing FMNB-2 models for more accurate crash modification estimations.
- The findings suggest a need to re-evaluate current methods for combining CMFs, especially under complex covariate interactions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Determination of Expected Frequency
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Hazard Rate

