Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 9, 2026
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Is the humeral stem useful in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty?
Philippe Collin1, Tetsu Matsukawa2,3, Pascal Boileau4
1Institut Locomoteur de l'Ouest CHP Saint Grégoire (vivalto Santé), 6 Boulevard de la Boutière, 35740, Saint Grégoire, France. collin.ph@wanadoo.fr.
Purpose:
Traditionally and since Neer, the humeral side of shoulder arthroplasty consisted of a stemmed component but the real need for stem fixation in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has barely been investigated. The current study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes with a stemless TSA.
Methods:
Forty-seven patients, 20 female and 27 male patients with an average age of 63, were selected in four orthopaedic centres during a four year period, and implanted with a humeral head prosthesis with a three-fin design and titanium coating. Aetiologies were: primary osteoarthritis (29), fracture sequelae (12) and avascular osteonecrosis (6). Minimum follow-up was two years (range 24-51 months). The patients were evaluated with the Constant score (CS) and radiological exams.
Results:
Two patients had revision of the implants, one for persistent pain and one for secondary massive rotator cuff tear. At the final follow-up, the mean CS was 69, with an average gain of 36. All parameters improved with a foremost in pain relief. Mean satisfaction rate was 87%. Average anterior active elevation was 131° with a gain of 48. Radiologic evaluations showed stable implants in all cases. However, 17 cases demonstrated radiolucent areas, particularly superior and lateral to the implant, which neither decreased nor increased with time. No revisions were related to humeral component loosening.
Conclusions:
Stemless TSA provides the same results as compared to TSA with a humeral stem. We are still unsure as to the nature of the lucent zones and we are continuing our investigation to better understand this radiological phenomenon.
