Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

7.2K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
7.2K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.3K
Residuals and Least-Squares Property01:11

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

9.7K
The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
9.7K
Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

4.2K
Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
4.2K
Regression Analysis01:11

Regression Analysis

8.7K
Regression analysis is a statistical tool that describes a mathematical relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
8.7K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

1.1K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fitting Curves and Surfaces with Monotonic and Non-Monotonic Four Parameter Equations.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

Consensus Values and Weighting Factors.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

The Regression Analysis of Collinear Data.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

Ruggedness Testing-Part I: Ignoring Interactions.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

Ruggedness Testing-Part II: Recognizing Interactions.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same author

Effect of Variables on pH Measurement in Acid-Rain-Like Solutions as Determined by Ruggedness Tests.

Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards (1977)·2021
Same journal

Precise Numerical Differentiation of Thermodynamic Functions with Multicomplex Variables.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Characterization of 3-Dimensional Printing and Casting Materials for use in Computed Tomography and X-ray Imaging Phantoms.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

On The Quotient of a Centralized and a Non-centralized Complex Gaussian Random Variable.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Fast Methods for Finding Multiple Effective Influencers in Real Networks.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

Disinfection of Respirators with Ultraviolet Radiation.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
Same journal

DNA Origami Design: A How-To Tutorial.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Consensus Values, Regressions, and Weighting Factors.

Robert C Paule1, John Mandel1

  • 1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology
|January 6, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study extends consensus value theory by calculating weighted averages from multiple measurement sources. It accounts for within- and between-source variability for improved accuracy in scientific data analysis.

Keywords:
Taylor seriescomponents of variance (within- and between-groups)consensus valuesconvergence proofweighted averageweighted least squares regression

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Measurement Science
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Consensus values are crucial for synthesizing data from multiple sources.
  • Existing methods may not adequately account for varying source reliabilities.
  • Accurate consensus values require robust statistical frameworks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend the theory of consensus values.
  • To develop a method for calculating consensus values from multiple measurement sources with differing variabilities.
  • To provide a framework for both weighted averages and weighted regression.

Main Methods:

  • A novel iterative procedure is introduced for calculating consensus values.
  • Weighting factors are derived from both within-source and between-source variability.
  • The method is applicable to weighted average and weighted regression scenarios.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method provides a statistically sound approach to consensus value calculation.
  • An outline of a proof for the convergence of the iterative procedure is presented.
  • The weighting factors effectively incorporate source-specific variability.

Conclusions:

  • The extended theory offers a more accurate method for determining consensus values.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of data synthesis in scientific research.
  • The iterative procedure is computationally feasible and statistically robust.