Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

307
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
307
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction01:21

Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction

306
Physical attractiveness plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal attraction, influencing first impressions, social interactions, and long-term relationship dynamics. Psychological research consistently demonstrates that attractiveness affects social evaluations and behavioral outcomes in various contexts.Influence on Social InteractionsResearch has shown that individuals perceived as physically attractive often experience preferential treatment in social and professional settings. One...
306
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

17.0K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
17.0K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.8K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

44.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
44.0K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Imitation in the eyes of others: Agency and communion in observed mimicry.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Valence Asymmetry in Cognition-A Formal Account.

Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc·2026
Same author

The role of comparison processes in maintenance goals: Evidence from the health and relationship domains.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2026
Same author

Choosing to believe: How active sampling enhances the truth effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

"If Immoral Then Unable": Asymmetric Generalizations in Social Judgment.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 9, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Why Good Is More Alike Than Bad: Processing Implications.

Hans Alves1, Alex Koch1, Christian Unkelbach1

  • 1Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|January 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Negative information has a stronger psychological impact than positive information. This study proposes that positive information is more similar, explaining cognitive processing differences and predicting new phenomena.

Keywords:
affectcognitionsimilarityvalence

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 9, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

18.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Humans exhibit valence asymmetries in information processing, commonly summarized as 'bad is stronger than good'.
  • This asymmetry is often attributed to affective or motivational reactions to evaluative information.
  • Existing theories focus on emotional responses to explain why negative information has a greater impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present an alternative interpretation of valence asymmetries in information processing.
  • To explain these asymmetries based on the inherent similarity of positive information.
  • To explore how information similarity influences cognitive processing and predict novel phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of positive and negative information attributes.
  • Theoretical modeling of information similarity and its cognitive consequences.
  • Empirical investigation of valence asymmetries in cognitive tasks.

Main Results:

  • Positive attributes are inherently less extreme, leading to higher similarity among positive stimuli compared to negative stimuli.
  • This higher similarity of positive information provides an alternative explanation for valence asymmetries in cognitive processing.
  • The similarity-based account predicts previously unobserved phenomena in how individuals process evaluative information.

Conclusions:

  • Valence asymmetries in human cognition may stem from the differential similarity of positive versus negative information.
  • The non-extremity of positive attributes is a key factor driving this similarity.
  • This framework offers a novel perspective on information processing and has implications for understanding learning, decision-making, and social interactions.