Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2026

11:35
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
58.8K
Income in Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Different Disease Phenotypes
Andrius Kavaliunas1, Ali Manouchehrinia1, Virginija Danylaite Karrenbauer1,2
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Plos One
|January 13, 2017
Summary
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) earn significantly more than those with primary progressive MS (PPMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Findings suggest PPMS and SPMS are socioeconomically similar, emphasizing the need to prevent RRMS progression.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Health Economics
- Socioeconomic Studies
Background:
- Multiple Sclerosis (MS) presents with significant heterogeneity in its clinical progression.
- Understanding the socioeconomic impact across different MS phenotypes is crucial for patient support and healthcare planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate income levels and sources among Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients in Sweden.
- To compare income disparities between primary progressive MS (PPMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) phenotypes.
- To identify similarities and differences in income between PPMS and SPMS patients.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study of 6890 MS patients (aged 21-64) in Sweden (2010).
- Utilized descriptive statistics and regression models (logistic, truncated linear, zero-inflated negative binomial) to analyze income data.
- Compared income and benefit receipt across RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS patient groups.
Main Results:
- Relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients reported nearly double the income of PPMS and SPMS patients.
- Average annual incomes were SEK 204,500 (RRMS), SEK 114,500 (PPMS), and SEK 79,800 (SPMS).
- No statistically significant difference in earnings was found between PPMS and SPMS patients using multivariable regression; PPMS and RRMS patients were less likely to receive benefits than SPMS patients.
Conclusions:
- Primary progressive MS (PPMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) exhibit socioeconomic similarities.
- Preventing the conversion of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) to SPMS is vital for maintaining patients' socioeconomic well-being.
- The findings underscore the significant economic burden associated with progressive MS phenotypes.

