Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Continence following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

P D O'Donnell1, B F Finan

  • 1Veterans Administration Medical Center, Little Rock, Arkansas.

The Journal of Urology
|November 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Preserving pelvic nerves during radical prostatectomy significantly improves urinary continence. Nerve-sparing surgery leads to better functional urethral length and pressure, reducing incontinence rates post-surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Special considerations in elderly individuals with urinary incontinence.

Urology·1998
Same author

Behavioral modification for institutionalized individuals with urinary incontinence.

Urology·1998
Same author

Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. The American Urological Association.

The Journal of urology·1997
Same author

Effects of subcutaneous bethanechol on bladder sensation during cystometry.

Urology·1993
Same author

Effects of serum acid phosphatase [correction of phosphate] elevation following transurethral prostatectomy on long-term mortality.

The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society·1992
Same author

Results of surgical management of Peyronie's disease.

The Journal of urology·1992

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Urinary incontinence is a common and challenging complication following radical prostatectomy.
  • The relationship between surgical technique and postoperative incontinence remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare urinary continence outcomes in patients undergoing nerve-sparing versus nonnerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
  • To evaluate the impact of nerve preservation on functional urethral parameters.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study of 68 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
  • 34 patients had nonnerve-sparing surgery, and 34 had nerve-sparing surgery.
  • Postoperative urinary continence, functional urethral length, and urethral pressure were assessed.

Main Results:

  • The nerve-sparing group had significantly lower rates of total (0% vs. 12%) and stress (6% vs. 18%) incontinence.
  • Patients in the nerve-sparing group showed significantly greater functional urethral length (2.3 cm vs. 1.9 cm).
  • Peak resting urethral pressure was also significantly higher in the nerve-sparing group (46.5 cm water vs. 35.4 cm water).

Conclusions:

  • Preservation of pelvic nerves during radical prostatectomy plays a crucial role in maintaining urinary continence.
  • Nerve-sparing technique positively impacts urethral function, leading to better continence outcomes.
  • This finding supports the routine use of nerve-sparing approaches when oncologically feasible.

Related Experiment Videos