Screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci with Xpert® vanA/vanB: diagnostic accuracy and impact on infection

B J Holzknecht1, D S Hansen1, L Nielsen1

  • 1Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

Insights

PCR screening for vanA-positive Enterococcus faecium rapidly identifies colonization, aiding infection control. This method significantly reduces isolation and transmission risk days compared to traditional culture methods.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Hospital Epidemiology

Background:

  • Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are significant healthcare-associated pathogens.
  • Screening for VRE colonization is crucial for infection control strategies.
  • Rapid diagnostics are needed to guide timely interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of PCR-based screening for vanA-positive Enterococcus faecium.
  • To compare PCR turnaround time with traditional culture methods.
  • To assess the impact of PCR results on infection control decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented Xpert vanA/vanB PCR directly on rectal swabs during VRE outbreaks.
  • Concurrently performed selective culture with enrichment for all samples.
  • Calculated diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) and turnaround times.

Main Results:

  • The vanA PCR demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (Sensitivity: 87.1%, Specificity: 99.7%).
  • PCR results were available within 1 day for 96.1% of samples, compared to a median culture time of 3 days.
  • Prompt PCR results led to significant savings in isolation and transmission risk days.

Conclusions:

  • VanA PCR offers high diagnostic accuracy and rapid results for VRE screening.
  • The timely availability of PCR data substantially benefits infection control practices.
  • PCR-based screening is a valuable tool for managing VRE outbreaks in hospital settings.