Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 7, 2026

One-day Workflow Scheme for Bacterial Pathogen Detection and Antimicrobial Resistance Testing from Blood Cultures
Published on: July 9, 2012
Screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci with Xpert® vanA/vanB: diagnostic accuracy and impact on infection
B J Holzknecht1, D S Hansen1, L Nielsen1
1Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Abstract:
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are increasingly important nosocomial pathogens and screening for colonization status is a mainstay in infection control. We implemented PCR-based screening during vanA-positive Enterococcus faecium outbreaks in four university hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark. Xpert®vanA/vanB was performed directly on rectal swabs and the vanA PCR result was used to guide infection control measures. Concurrently, all samples were selectively cultured including an overnight enrichment step. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated as well as turnaround time and the impact of the earlier available PCR results on infection control decision making. In all, 1110 samples were analysed. The vanA PCR positivity rate was 13.8% and culture positivity rate was 15.2%. The diagnostic accuracy of the vanA part of the assay was high with a sensitivity of 87.1%, a specificity of 99.7%, and positive and negative predictive values of 98.0% and 97.7%, respectively. The vanB PCR had a considerably lower specificity of 77.6% and a positive predictive value of 0.4%. In 1067 (96.1%) samples, PCR results were reported within 1 day, whereas median culture turnaround time was 3 days. The saving of time to available results corresponded to 141 saved isolation days and 292 saved transmission risk days. False-negative or false-positive PCR results led to six additional transmission risk days and 13 additional isolation days, respectively. The vanA PCR had high diagnostic accuracy and the prompt availability of results gave a considerable benefit for infection control decision making.
Insights
PCR screening for vanA-positive Enterococcus faecium rapidly identifies colonization, aiding infection control. This method significantly reduces isolation and transmission risk days compared to traditional culture methods.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Hospital Epidemiology
Background:
- Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are significant healthcare-associated pathogens.
- Screening for VRE colonization is crucial for infection control strategies.
- Rapid diagnostics are needed to guide timely interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of PCR-based screening for vanA-positive Enterococcus faecium.
- To compare PCR turnaround time with traditional culture methods.
- To assess the impact of PCR results on infection control decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Implemented Xpert vanA/vanB PCR directly on rectal swabs during VRE outbreaks.
- Concurrently performed selective culture with enrichment for all samples.
- Calculated diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) and turnaround times.
Main Results:
- The vanA PCR demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (Sensitivity: 87.1%, Specificity: 99.7%).
- PCR results were available within 1 day for 96.1% of samples, compared to a median culture time of 3 days.
- Prompt PCR results led to significant savings in isolation and transmission risk days.
Conclusions:
- VanA PCR offers high diagnostic accuracy and rapid results for VRE screening.
- The timely availability of PCR data substantially benefits infection control practices.
- PCR-based screening is a valuable tool for managing VRE outbreaks in hospital settings.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness

