Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

10:35
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
18.8K
The spatial accuracy of two frameless, linear accelerator-based systems for single-isocenter, multitarget cranial
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|March 17, 2017
Summary
Single-isocenter cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is efficient but has spatial uncertainties. Cone beam CT (CBCT) image guidance showed better accuracy for targets farther from the isocenter compared to ExacTrac.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiosurgery Technology
Background:
- Single-isocenter, multitarget cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers efficiency but poses challenges with spatial accuracy, particularly for targets distant from the isocenter.
- Frameless, linac-based SRS systems are increasingly used for multitarget treatments, necessitating precise spatial positioning.
- Understanding the impact of distance from the isocenter on positioning accuracy is crucial for treatment planning and safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the spatial accuracy of two frameless, linac-based SRS systems for single-isocenter, multitarget treatments.
- To assess the accuracy as a function of distance from the isocenter.
- To inform the selection of appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins for multitarget SRS.
Main Methods:
- Two SRS systems were evaluated: one using ExacTrac for image guidance and another using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
- A phantom with 12 targets (BBs) was positioned at varying distances (up to 13.8 cm) from the isocenter.
- Data were collected after initiating alignment from five different offsets and imaging at seven gantry and couch angles.
Main Results:
- Positioning errors varied with distance from the isocenter for both systems.
- A 1-mm PTV margin was deemed adequate for targets up to approximately 7-8 cm from the isocenter.
- For targets 10 cm or more from the isocenter, CBCT-based alignment errors were within 1.1 mm, while ExacTrac-based errors reached up to 2.2 mm.
Conclusions:
- CBCT-based image guidance demonstrated superior spatial accuracy for targets farther from the isocenter in single-isocenter, multitarget cranial SRS.
- The findings support the use of CBCT for improved precision in complex SRS cases.
- Careful consideration of PTV margins is necessary, especially for targets located at greater distances from the treatment isocenter.

