Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

376
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
376
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

311
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
311
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

15.3K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
15.3K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

301
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
301
Probability Histograms01:17

Probability Histograms

13.4K
A probability histogram is a visual representation of a probability distribution. Similar a typical histogram, the probability histogram consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. It has both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The horizontal axis is labeled with what the data represents. The vertical axis is labeled with probability. Each rectangular bar in the histogram is 1 unit wide, which suggests that the area under each bar equals the probability, P(x), where x is 1, 2, 3, and so on.
13.4K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.3K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial intelligence-enabled histological analysis in pre-clinical respiratory disease models: a scoping review.

European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society·2026
Same author

Toward robust automated cardiovascular arrhythmia detection using self-supervised learning and 1-dimensional vision transformers.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence for electrocardiographic diagnosis of perioperative myocardial ischaemia: a scoping review.

British journal of anaesthesia·2025
Same author

Dual Adapter Tuning of Vision-Language Models Using Large Language Models.

International journal of computational intelligence systems·2025
Same author

Graph Anomaly Detection in Time Series: A Survey.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2025
Same author

Development and Feasibility Study of HOPE Model for Prediction of Depression Among Older Adults Using Wi-Fi-based Motion Sensor Data: Machine Learning Study.

JMIR aging·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.4K

Logistic Localized Modeling of the Sample Space for Feature Selection and Classification.

Narges Armanfard, James P Reilly, Majid Komeili

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |March 24, 2017
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces logistic localized feature selection (lLFS), an algorithm that selects unique feature subsets for different data regions. This localized approach improves performance and reduces overfitting, especially with limited training data.

    More Related Videos

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    8.1K
    Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data
    04:57

    Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data

    Published on: May 16, 2022

    17.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 5, 2026

    Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
    03:37

    Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

    Published on: March 1, 2024

    1.4K
    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    8.1K
    Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data
    04:57

    Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size LEfSe in Microbiome Data

    Published on: May 16, 2022

    17.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Data Science
    • Pattern Recognition

    Background:

    • Conventional feature selection assigns a single feature set across all data, limiting adaptability.
    • Existing methods may not effectively handle complex, non-linear data distributions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a novel localized feature selection algorithm (lLFS) that adapts feature subsets to specific data regions.
    • To improve classification performance by optimizing feature selection for local sample space variations.

    Main Methods:

    • Proposed logistic localized feature selection (lLFS) algorithm.
    • Feature subset optimization by creating an optimal coordinate space to minimize within-class and maximize between-class distances locally.
    • Utilized a logistic function metric for distance measurement and a local classification approach for similarity assessment.

    Main Results:

    • lLFS demonstrated improved performance across various datasets.
    • The number of selected features saturated at the number of discriminative features, indicating efficiency.
    • The Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension was shown to be finite, suggesting resistance to overfitting.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed logistic localized feature selection (lLFS) algorithm offers adaptive feature selection for improved performance.
    • lLFS is robust, invariant to data distribution, and suitable for small sample sizes and complex manifolds.
    • The method shows reduced sensitivity to overfitting compared to traditional approaches.