Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Four questions for passive frame theory.

David A Rosenbaum1

  • 1Department of Psychology,Pennsylvania State University,University Park,PA 16802.dar12@psu.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/rosenb13/.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|March 31, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hands can play equal roles in bimanual single-object rotations.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Pre-crastination and path planning: Evidence for cognitive frontloading, a new sibling for cognitive offloading.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Goals for kinematic coding: Insights from the posture-based motion planning perspective.

Physics of life reviews·2025
Same author

Free-range haptic search.

Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale·2025
Same author

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000-2005.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

Acting with the feet and hands: Does one effector system dominate the other?

Acta psychologica·2024
Same journal

Are language models models?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Large language models illuminate the mechanistic underpinnings of the creative aspect of language use (CALU), long regarded as a mystery.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

LLMs as a platform for studying constraint interaction: Motivation and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond the data gap: Children create languages, violate their input statistics, and exhibit critical periods.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Not-so-strange love: Language models and generative linguistic theories are more compatible than they appear.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Rich data drive generalization: Lessons from machine learning for linguistics and cognitive science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

This study examines Morsella et al."s passive frame theory, questioning its relationship with attention bottlenecks, consciousness, non-muscular animals, and automaticity development.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Philosophy of Mind

Background:

  • The passive frame theory proposes a novel framework for understanding action and consciousness.
  • Existing theories of attention and consciousness offer different perspectives on these phenomena.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the passive frame theory by posing four key questions.
  • To explore the theory's compatibility with established concepts in attention and consciousness research.
  • To extend the theoretical considerations to non-human animals and developmental aspects of automaticity.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis and theoretical integration.
  • Comparative examination of the passive frame theory with the response-selection-bottleneck model of attention.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of the theory's implications for the contents of consciousness.
  • Consideration of the theory's applicability to organisms lacking skeletal muscles.
  • Analysis of the theory's capacity to explain changes in conscious content with increasing automaticity.

    • Main Results:

    • The passive frame theory's relationship with the response-selection-bottleneck view of attention requires further clarification.
    • The theory's accommodation of the contents of consciousness presents a significant challenge.
    • The theory's applicability to animals without skeletal muscles is questionable.
    • The theory's explanation for the developmental changes in conscious content due to automaticity needs elaboration.

    Conclusions:

    • The passive frame theory, while innovative, faces several conceptual hurdles.
    • Further theoretical development is needed to address its limitations regarding attention, consciousness, interspecies applicability, and automaticity.
    • The questions raised highlight critical areas for future research in cognitive science and philosophy of mind.