Is Orthopedic Department Teaching Status Associated With Adverse Outcomes Of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Related Experiment Videos
Matthew R Boylan1, Dean C Perfetti2, Qais Naziri2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York.
Background:
Although resident physicians play a vital role in the US health care system, they are believed to create inefficiencies in the delivery of care. Under the regional component of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model, teaching hospitals are forced to compete on efficiency and outcomes with nonteaching hospitals.
Methods:
We identified 86,021 patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty in New York State between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2014. Outcomes included length and cost of the index admission, disposition, and 90-day readmission. Mixed-effects regression models compared teaching vs nonteaching orthopedic hospitals after adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital, surgeon, and year of surgery.
Results:
Patients undergoing surgery at teaching hospitals had longer lengths of stay (β = 3.2%; P < .001) and higher costs of admission (β = 13.6%; P < .001). There were no differences in disposition status (odds ratio = 1.03; P = .779). The risk of 90-day readmission was lower for teaching hospitals (odds ratio = 0.89; P = .001).
Conclusion:
Primary total hip arthroplasty at teaching orthopedic hospitals is characterized by greater utilization of health care resources during the index admission. This suggests that teaching hospitals may be adversely affected by reimbursement tied to competition on economic and clinical metrics. Although a certain level of inefficiency is inherent during the learning process, these policies may hinder learning opportunities for residents in the clinical setting.