Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Artificial intelligence in mitral valve analysis.

Jelliffe Jeganathan1, Ziyad Knio2, Yannis Amador3

  • 1Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
|April 11, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emergency mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in cardiogenic shock due to papillary muscle rupture.

Journal of cardiology cases·2026
Same author

Echocardiographic correlates of pressure-volume-derived indices: Advancing intraoperative assessment of right ventricular function.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

Leveraging Digital Technologies to Establish a Perioperative Ultrasound Program.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2026
Same author

Beyond the 30-day metric: National trends and predictors of 90-day readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting.

American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice·2026
Same author

Urgent Transcatheter Edge-To-Edge Mitral Valve Repair in Cardiogenic Shock: A Case Series.

A&A practice·2026
Same author

Peak Gradients and Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Area in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy:A 3-Dimensional Echocardiography Study.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2026
Same journal

Chronic Preoperative B-blocker Therapy and Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation after Elective Ascending Aortic Surgery.

Annals of cardiac anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Thrombocytopenia After Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Annals of cardiac anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Effect of Albumin Concentration and Timing on Acute Kidney Injury After Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Annals of cardiac anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Early Postoperative Complications and Risk Assessment in Cardiac Surgery: A Cohort Study.

Annals of cardiac anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Preincisional Ultrasound Guided Pecto-intercostal Fascial Plane Block with Ropivacaine and Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Open Heart Surgery by Median Sternotomy - A Prospective Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.

Annals of cardiac anaesthesia·2026
Same journal

Incidence and Associated Factors of ST-Segment Changes in Noncardiac Surgery Under General Anesthesia.

Annals of cardiac anaesthesia·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

Automated mitral valve (MV) analysis software shows good reproducibility, minimizing interobserver variability. This AI-driven tool offers reliable measurements with minimal user input for MV disease management.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Echocardiographic analysis of the mitral valve (MV) is crucial for diagnosing and managing MV disease.
  • Current software relies on manual input, leading to significant interobserver variability in measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the interobserver variability of an automated, artificial intelligence-driven software for MV analysis.
  • To evaluate the reproducibility of AI-based MV measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of intraoperative 3D transesophageal echocardiography data from four patients.
  • Analysis of 36 end-systolic frames using eSie Valve Software by three independent examiners.
  • Statistical analysis using a mixed-effects ANOVA model with Bonferroni correction.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No significant effect of the examiner on any of the six measured MV parameters.
  • Patient and loop variations significantly impacted average parameter values (P < 0.0083).
  • Demonstrated good reproducibility in automated MV analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Automated MV analysis software provides reproducible results with minimal user intervention.
  • AI-powered tools can reduce interobserver variability in echocardiographic measurements.
  • This technology holds promise for more consistent MV disease assessment.