Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Update on Preoperative Breast Localization.

Mary K Hayes1

  • 1Women's Imaging, Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Sheridan-Envision, Department of Radiology, Memorial Healthcare System, 3rd Floor, 3501 Johnson Street, Hollywood, FL 33021, USA.

Radiologic Clinics of North America
|April 17, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

Radiology·2020
Same author

Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2017
Same author

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2016
Same author

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Palpable Breast Masses.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2016
Same author

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Stage I Breast Cancer: Initial Workup and Surveillance for Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases in Asymptomatic Women.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2016
Same author

ACR Appropriateness Criteria<sup>®</sup> Stage I Breast Carcinoma.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2016
Same journal

Imaging, Management, and Treatment of Orbital Trauma.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Imaging Findings after Multidisciplinary Treatment for Orbital and Ocular Adnexal Cancers.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Orbital Tumors: What the Radiologist Needs to Know from the Orbital Surgeon's Perspective.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Multidisciplinary Management of Tumors of the Orbit.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Skull Base, Bone, Pituitary-Regions around Orbit that Affect Vision.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Imaging of Central Nervous System Diseases that Affect Vision.

Radiologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Non-wire devices offer a safe and effective alternative for breast cancer preoperative localization, improving surgical outcomes. This technology is advancing for broader applications in neoadjuvant treatment and MRI-only findings.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Radiologists are crucial for breast cancer management, including detection, diagnosis, and localization.
  • Effective breast cancer treatment relies on collaboration between radiologists and surgeons, utilizing advanced imaging tools.
  • Preoperative localization is a key step in guiding breast cancer surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolving tools for preoperative breast cancer localization.
  • To highlight non-wire devices as a safe and efficient alternative to traditional wire localization.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature and emerging technologies in preoperative breast cancer localization.
  • Comparison of non-wire localization devices with standard wire localization techniques.
Keywords:
BreastMAGSEEDMalignant neoplasmRadioactive seed localization I125 (RSL)Radiofrequency identification (RFID)SCOUT RADARTargeted axillary dissection (TAD)Wire localization (WL, WNL)Wire-free localization

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Non-wire devices are a safe, efficient, and noninferior alternative to wire localization for preoperative breast cancer marking.
  • These devices can be placed between 0 and 30 days prior to surgery.
  • Potential for future applications in patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy or with MRI-only detected lesions.

Conclusions:

  • Non-wire localization represents a significant advancement in breast cancer preoperative imaging guidance.
  • This technology offers flexibility and improved patient management, particularly for specific treatment scenarios.
  • Continued evolution of non-wire devices promises broader, cost-effective applications in breast cancer care.