Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

06:15
A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
Published on: July 10, 2017
CTSA Institution Responses to Proposed Common Rule Changes: Did They Get What They Wanted?
Suzanne M Rivera1, Lisa Nichols2, Lois Brako3
11 Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Summary
Research institutions largely opposed proposed changes to human subject protection regulations, particularly concerning de-identified biospecimens. The final rule was issued in 2017, with this analysis comparing proposed and final changes.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical research ethics
- Regulatory science
- Public health policy
Background:
- In 2015, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposed revisions to Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects.
- The goal was to modernize regulations, enhance effectiveness, and reduce administrative burdens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review public comments from National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) institutions on proposed regulatory changes.
- To understand the reception of these proposals at research-intensive institutions.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of public comments submitted by CTSA institutions in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM).
- Comparison of the proposed rule changes with the final rule issued in January 2017.
Main Results:
- CTSA institutions predominantly opposed major proposals in the NPRM.
- Opposition was particularly strong regarding the proposed treatment of de-identified biospecimens.
- This indicates a lack of support from academic medical centers for key aspects of the proposed revisions.
Conclusions:
- The proposed revisions to human subjects protection regulations faced significant opposition from key research institutions.
- The final rule, issued in 2017, may differ from the initial proposals based on this feedback.
- Further analysis is needed to compare the final rule directly with the proposed changes and their implications.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Obedience
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Regulation of Expression at Multiple Steps
The gene expression in cells is regulated at different stages: (i) transcription, (ii) RNA processing, (iii) RNA localization, and (iv) translation. Transcriptional regulation is mediated by regulatory proteins such as transcription factors, activators, or repressors—these control gene expression by initiating or inhibiting the transcription of genes. Once a precursor or pre-mRNA is produced, it undergoes post-transcriptional modification, including 5' capping, splicing, and the addition of a...
Standards of Care I
Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:
Standards of Care II
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

