Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

05:19
A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
953
Physician preference and patient satisfaction with radioactive seed versus wire localization
Anya Romanoff1, Hank Schmidt1, Matthew McMurray1
1Department of Surgery, Dubin Breast Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
The Journal of Surgical Research
|May 2, 2017
Summary
Wire localization (WL) and radioactive seed localization (SL) offer similar patient satisfaction for nonpalpable breast lesions. Physician and patient preference, along with logistical factors, influence the choice between WL and SL.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Breast Surgery
- Oncology
Background:
- Nonpalpable breast lesions necessitate preoperative localization for surgical excision.
- Wire localization (WL) and radioactive seed localization (SL) are common methods, but no guidelines exist for modality selection.
- Investigating factors influencing SL versus WL selection and patient satisfaction is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors influencing the choice between radioactive seed localization (SL) and wire localization (WL) for nonpalpable breast lesions.
- To assess and compare patient satisfaction with both SL and WL procedures.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 341 patients undergoing preoperative localization from May 2014 to August 2015.
- Physician surveys to determine factors influencing the decision between SL and WL.
- Postoperative patient surveys to evaluate satisfaction and comfort levels.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in patient demographics, disease characteristics, or need for axillary surgery between SL and WL groups.
- Physician preference was the primary driver for selecting SL or WL when both were options.
- Patient satisfaction, preoperative anxiety, and postoperative pain were comparable between SL and WL groups.
Conclusions:
- Both radioactive seed localization (SL) and wire localization (WL) provide similar patient comfort and satisfaction.
- The selection between SL and WL is influenced by a combination of logistic and clinical considerations, including physician and patient preference.

