Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

821
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
821
Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

1.0K
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
1.0K
Subconsciousness and No Awareness01:15

Subconsciousness and No Awareness

752
The concept of subconscious awareness refers to the processing of information below the level of conscious thought, which significantly influences both behaviors and decisions. It is also known as waking subconscious awareness. This complex level of cognition operates without the direct awareness of the individual, facilitating rapid and simultaneous handling of multiple information streams.
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
752

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A computational psychological approach to complex emotion: interest links complex emotion and attractiveness.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Development and validation of the Thoughts on Eating Scale: a domain-specific measure of belief orientations toward eating.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Anatomical-connectivity-guided functional connectivity reveals task-relevant pathways during proactive task-switching via recurrent graph neural networks.

Brain informatics·2026
Same author

Evaluating human perceptions of android robot facial expressions based on variations in instruction styles.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Does information predicting "when" and "what" facilitate target detection interactively?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.2K

Relationship between workload and mind-wandering in simulated driving.

Yuyu Zhang1, Takatsune Kumada1

  • 1Department of Intelligence Science and Technology, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Plos One
|May 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Driving safety is linked to mental workload and mind-wandering. This study found workload and mind-wandering have complex relationships, varying between individuals and over time during driving tasks.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

5.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 3, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.2K
Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

9.6K
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

5.1K

Area of Science:

  • Human Factors
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Transportation Safety

Background:

  • Mental workload and mind-wandering are critical factors influencing driving safety.
  • Understanding their interplay is essential for developing safer driving environments and interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between mental workload and mind-wandering during a driving task.
  • To explore how these factors interact from both an individual and a temporal perspective.

Main Methods:

  • Forty participants completed a car following task in a driving simulator.
  • Mind-wandering was assessed via self-report triggered by auditory cues.
  • Mental workload was measured post-task using the NASA-Task Load Index (TLX).

Main Results:

  • A significant negative correlation was observed between individual workload and mind-wandering frequency (r = -0.459, p < 0.01).
  • Over the duration of the task, both mental workload and mind-wandering frequency increased significantly and were positively correlated.
  • These results indicate a dual relationship between workload and mind-wandering in driving.

Conclusions:

  • Mental workload and mind-wandering exhibit a complex, context-dependent relationship during driving.
  • Individual differences in workload correlate inversely with mind-wandering, while task progression shows a positive correlation.
  • These findings enhance our comprehension of cognitive factors impacting driving performance and safety.