Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

12:03
Viability Assays for Cells in Culture
Published on: January 20, 2014
47.4K
Assessment of Cell Viability with Single-, Dual-, and Multi-Staining Methods Using Image Cytometry
Leo Li-Ying Chan1, Kelsey J McCulley2, Sarah L Kessel2
1Department of Technology R&D, Nexcelom Bioscience LLC, 360 Merrimack Street, Building 9, Lawrence, MA, 01843, USA. lchan@nexcelom.com.
Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|May 5, 2017
Summary
Image-based cytometry offers a more accurate method for measuring cell viability compared to traditional trypan blue exclusion. This advanced technique simplifies cell counting and viability assessments, especially in complex biological samples.
Area of Science:
- Cell Biology
- Biotechnology
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Accurate cell viability measurement is crucial for cell-based assays.
- Traditional trypan blue exclusion method faces limitations with complex samples like whole blood or low-viability samples.
- Automated image-based cell counters have emerged due to advances in optics and fluorescent dyes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the utility of image-based cytometry for cell viability detection.
- To evaluate single-, dual-, and multi-stain techniques for viability assessment.
- To highlight the advantages of fluorescent viability staining and image cytometry in simplifying sample preparation and analysis.
Main Methods:
- Utilized single-staining with nucleic acid stains (e.g., EB, PI, DAPI) and enzymatic stains (e.g., CFDA, Calcein AM).
- Employed dual-staining methods (e.g., AO/PI, Hoechst/PI) to enumerate viable and nonviable cells.
- Applied a multi-staining method using Hoechst/Calcein AM/PI for comprehensive analysis.
Main Results:
- Fluorescent viability staining effectively excludes cellular debris and nonnucleated cells.
- Image-based cytometry streamlines cell counting and viability measurements, improving efficiency.
- The method simplifies sample preparation by potentially eliminating purification steps.
Conclusions:
- Image-based cytometry provides a robust and efficient alternative to traditional methods for cell viability assessment.
- The use of fluorescent stains enhances accuracy by enabling exclusion of non-relevant cellular components.
- Automated image cytometers offer increased speed, throughput, and visual confirmation of results.
Keywords:
CeligoCellometerEnzymatic stainFluorescent stainImage cytometryMulti-stain methodNucleic acid stainTrypan blueViabilityMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Flow Cytometry
16.8K
The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...
In...
16.8K
Fixation and Sectioning
8.6K
Two basic types of preparation are used to visualize specimens with a light microscope: wet mounts and fixed specimens.
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...
8.6K

