Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comprehensive approach to faculty evaluation.

D L Boland1, S L Sims

  • 1Brigham Young University, College of Nursing.

The Journal of Nursing Education
|October 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enacting narrative pedagogy. The lived experiences of students and teachers.

Nursing and health care perspectives·2005
Same author

Integrating theory and research into practice.

Nurse educator·2002
Same author

Toward a narrative-centered curriculum for nurse practitioners.

The Journal of nursing education·2000
Same author

Reconceptualizing baccalaureate nursing education: outcomes and competencies for practice in the 21st century.

The Journal of nursing education·1996
Same author

Grounded theory as feminist research methodology.

Journal of advanced nursing·1996
Same author

Family care giving at home as a solitary journey.

Image--the journal of nursing scholarship·1996
Same journal

AI Utilization and Clinical Judgment: Predictors of Caring Behavior Among Nursing Students.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same journal

Mental Health Nursing Simulation to Develop the Therapeutic Use of Self.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same journal

Cultivating Clinical Judgment Through Wound Building: A Teaching Innovation.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same journal

Pathophysiology as a Predictor of Success in a Prelicensure Undergraduate Nursing Program.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same journal

Perceived Faculty Support and Nursing Student Stress and Anxiety: A Systematic Review.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
Same journal

Nursing Students' Ethical Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Nursing Education.

The Journal of nursing education·2026
See all related articles

This study developed a comprehensive faculty evaluation instrument to assess complex faculty roles. The tool enhances decision-making for faculty development, promotion, and retention.

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Higher Education Administration

Background:

  • Traditional faculty evaluation methods often fail to capture the multifaceted nature of academic roles.
  • A need exists for a more nuanced and comprehensive approach to assessing faculty performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To design and develop a robust faculty evaluation instrument.
  • To create a tool that reflects the complexities inherent in the faculty role.
  • To improve the process of faculty assessment in higher education.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a thorough review of existing literature and evaluation tools.
  • Performed content analyses of faculty job descriptions.
  • Modified and refined an 80-item instrument based on expert educator feedback.
  • Incorporated elements such as explicit criteria, flexible standards, and multi-source feedback.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Developed an 80-item faculty evaluation instrument.
  • The instrument design emphasizes explicit criteria, flexible standards, and multi-stakeholder involvement (students, peers, administrators, self).
  • The instrument, when paired with data management, supports informed decisions on faculty development, promotion, retention, and talent utilization.

Conclusions:

  • The designed instrument offers a comprehensive and flexible approach to faculty evaluation.
  • It facilitates more consistent and informed decision-making regarding faculty careers.
  • The instrument allows institutions to tailor performance standards to their unique values and faculty roles.