Increased odds and predictive rates of MMPI-2-RF scale elevations in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

Victor A Del Bene1, Miguel Arce Rentería2, Moshe Maiman3

  • 1NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, NYU School of Medicine, NY, New York 10016, United States; Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Clinical Health Psychology Program, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY 10461, United States.

Abstract

Insights

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizure (PNES) patients show higher odds of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scale elevations, especially for somatic concerns and mood. These findings aid in differentiating PNES from epileptic seizures (ES), but require careful interpretation due to potential misclassifications.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Neurology
  • Psychological Assessment

Background:

  • The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) is a validated tool for psychological assessment.
  • Previous studies indicated the MMPI-2-RF can distinguish between epileptic seizures (ES) and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES).
  • The diagnostic utility of specific MMPI-2-RF scale elevations for PNES, particularly in uncertain cases, remains underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the odds of MMPI-2-RF scale elevations in patients with PNES compared to ES.
  • To determine the diagnostic predictive value of these scale elevations for PNES.
  • To explore sex-based differences in MMPI-2-RF scale elevations among PNES patients.

Main Methods:

  • A sample of 92 ES and 77 PNES patients from video electroencephalogram (vEEG) monitoring were analyzed.
  • Contingency table-derived odds ratios were calculated to assess group differences.
  • Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), false discovery rate (FDR), and false omission rate (FOR) were computed for elevated scales.

Main Results:

  • PNES patients exhibited 2-5 times higher odds of MMPI-2-RF scale elevations related to somatic concerns, negative mood, and suicidal ideation.
  • Female PNES patients had 3-6 times greater odds, while male PNES patients had 5-15 times greater odds for these elevations.
  • Predictive values indicated a range of PPV (53.66%-84.62%) and NPV (47.52%-90.91%), with FDR (15.38%-50%) and FOR (9.09%-52.47%) also noted.

Conclusions:

  • PNES patients demonstrate increased MMPI-2-RF scale elevations, particularly concerning somatic and mood disturbances, aligning with prior research.
  • Elevations in specific MMPI-2-RF scales can assist in differentiating PNES from ES.
  • Clinical application requires caution due to the potential for false positives and false negatives in diagnosis.

Related Concept Videos