Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

06:08
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
1.0K
Narrative ordering and explanation
1Department of Economic History, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|June 7, 2017
Summary
This study explores how narrative ordering in social science research helps explain cases. Juxtaposition in narrative aids in resolving research puzzles and broadening explanation scope.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Qualitative Research Methods
Background:
- Case-based research in social sciences often relies on narrative.
- The structure and function of narrative within case studies require deeper investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of narrative in ordering materials within social science case-based research.
- To analyze how narrative ordering contributes to 'narrative explanation'.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of narrative ordering techniques in case studies.
- Examination of how conceptual or theoretical resources are integrated into narrative.
- Comparative analysis using an analogy to visual representation genres.
Main Results:
- Narrative ordering, particularly through juxtaposition, is linked to puzzle creation and resolution in research.
- Integrating theoretical resources within narrative ordering allows for the explanation of cases.
- Case explanations can achieve broader scope without claiming universal applicability.
Conclusions:
- Narrative ordering is a key mechanism for developing and refining explanations in social science case studies.
- Juxtaposition as a narrative strategy effectively addresses research questions.
- This approach allows for transferable insights from case studies.
Keywords:
Case studiesColligation and juxtapositionConfiguringExemplarsNarrative explanationResituating knowledgeMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
8.0K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error
14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K
Reason and Intuition
7.6K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.6K
Attribution
345
In social interactions, individuals frequently seek to understand the motivations and causes behind others' behaviors. This fundamental aspect of social perception, known as attribution, plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships and guiding future actions. Attribution refers to the cognitive process through which people infer the reasons behind others' behaviors, allowing them to assess character traits, intentions, and situational influences.Attribution Theory and Its...
345
Cause and Effect
12.6K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.6K
Attribution Theory
13.9K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.9K

