Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is a Hypothesis?01:14

What is a Hypothesis?

15.9K
A hypothesis can be a simple sentence or statement about a property or any phenomenon observed or predicted for a population. It is usually a claim about a  property of the population. It can be stated for any field observations or experiments. A hypothesis statement cannot be said to be right or wrong as it is merely a statement. It needs to be tested through an elaborate data collection process and an appropriate statistical test. A hypothesis should be a general but not a vague...
15.9K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

13.0K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
13.0K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.0K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

29.7K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
29.7K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

28.8K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
28.8K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

66.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bile Salts and Bacterial Bile Salt Hydrolase Activity Influence Escherichia coli Colonization and FXR Signaling in Colorectal Cancer Organoids.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

A reporting checklist for large language models in behavioural science.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Fast efficient coding and sensory adaptation in gain-adaptive recurrent networks.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Human-level learning of complex novel tasks as theory-based modelling, exploration and planning.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same author

Gradient Descent as Loss Landscape Navigation: a Normative Framework for Deriving Learning Rules.

Advances in neural information processing systems·2026
Same author

Probabilistic forecasting guides dynamic decisions.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K

Where do hypotheses come from?

Ishita Dasgupta1, Eric Schulz2, Samuel J Gershman3

  • 1Department of Physics and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, United States.

Cognitive Psychology
|June 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human reasoning can be near-perfect or biased. This study proposes a model where limited hypothesis sampling explains systematic deviations from rational inference, recreating known cognitive biases.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferenceHypothesis generationMonte Carlo methods

More Related Videos

Conducting Miller-Urey Experiments
11:10

Conducting Miller-Urey Experiments

Published on: January 21, 2014

70.9K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K
Conducting Miller-Urey Experiments
11:10

Conducting Miller-Urey Experiments

Published on: January 21, 2014

70.9K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Decision Science
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Human inference often deviates from normative models like Bayes' rule.
  • Understanding the cognitive mechanisms behind these biases is crucial for explaining human judgment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and test a computational model explaining systematic biases in human inference.
  • To investigate why hypothesis generation impacts inferential rationality.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a model where hypotheses are sampled stochastically, approximating a posterior distribution.
  • Evaluated the model's ability to replicate established cognitive phenomena.

Main Results:

  • The model successfully recreated anchoring and adjustment, subadditivity, superadditivity, and the self-generation effect.
  • Experimental manipulations confirmed predictions regarding hypothesis unpacking and typicality.

Conclusions:

  • Limited hypothesis sampling provides a unified algorithmic explanation for various human inferential biases.
  • The model offers insights into how cognitive constraints shape rational decision-making.