Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
Published on: July 1, 2015
Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potential and Behavioral Evidence for Differences in Auditory Processing between Good and
Matthew D Barker1, Abin Kuruvilla-Mathew1, Suzanne C Purdy1
1Discipline of Speech Science, School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
This study found that poor readers exhibit impaired auditory processing (AP) using behavioral and electrophysiological measures. These findings highlight the critical role of central auditory function in reading development.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Speech and Hearing Sciences
Background:
- The link between auditory processing (AP) and reading skills is significant but not fully understood.
- Previous research explored electrophysiological and behavioral AP measures in relation to children's reading abilities.
- This study aimed to deepen the understanding of the AP-reading relationship.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in auditory processing between good and poor readers.
- To utilize both electrophysiological and behavioral measures to assess AP.
- To identify specific AP deficits associated with reading difficulties.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-two children aged 9-11 years were categorized into good and poor reader groups based on standardized reading tests.
- Auditory processing was assessed using the "Feather Squadron" behavioral system and cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) with a speech stimulus.
- Kruskal-Wallis analyses compared behavioral scores and CAEP latencies/amplitudes between reading groups, with further subgroup analyses for auditory processing disorder (APD) and reading difficulty (RD).
Main Results:
- Poor readers performed significantly worse on specific behavioral tasks (Tonal Pattern 1, Tonal Pattern 2, Word Double Dichotic Right).
- Electrophysiological results revealed differences in CAEPs, suggesting comorbid effects of reading difficulty and AP difficulties.
- A significantly smaller N2 amplitude was observed in poor readers compared to good readers.
Conclusions:
- Altered auditory processing was identified in poor readers through both behavioral (Feather Squadron) and electrophysiological (speech-evoked CAEPs) methods.
- The findings reinforce the importance of intact central auditory function for successful reading development.
- This research contributes to understanding the neurophysiological underpinnings of reading difficulties.
More Related Videos
09:38Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
Published on: January 29, 2014
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017