Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Moment of Inertia01:14

Moment of Inertia

19.7K
The comparability between linear and angular velocities, linear and angular accelerations, and the kinematic equations of translational and rotational motion can be extended to the concept of inertia.
If a rigid body is rotating about an axis but is not in translational motion, its translational kinetic energy is zero. However, since each particle undergoes rotational motion, it possesses non-zero velocity and kinetic energy. Thus, the kinetic energy of the rigid body, which is the sum of the...
19.7K
Types of Kinetic Energy01:14

Types of Kinetic Energy

9.6K
The amount of kinetic energy of an object depends on its mass and speed. Consider two balls of different masses rolling down an inclined plane at the same speed. The heavier ball will have more kinetic energy. Similarly, when two balls of the same mass roll down an inclined plane at different speeds, the ball that moves faster has more kinetic energy.
There are several different forms of kinetic energy, including mechanical, electrical, radiant, and thermal energy. Mechanical energy is...
9.6K
Kinetic Energy - I01:18

Kinetic Energy - I

12.8K
It’s plausible to suppose that the greater the velocity of a body, the greater effect it could have on other bodies. This does not depend on the direction of the velocity, only its magnitude. At the end of the seventeenth century, a quantity was introduced into mechanics to explain collisions between two perfectly elastic bodies, in which one body makes a head-on collision with an identical body at rest. When they collide, the first body stops, and the second body moves off with the...
12.8K
The Swing Equation01:21

The Swing Equation

1.4K
The Swing Equation is a fundamental tool in power system dynamics, especially for analyzing the behavior of generating units like three-phase synchronous generators. This equation emerges from applying Newton's second law to the rotor of a generator, encompassing factors such as inertia, angular acceleration, and the interplay between mechanical and electrical torques.
In a steady-state operation, the mechanical torque (Τm) supplied to the generator is balanced by the electrical torque (Τe)...
1.4K
Kinematic Equations for Rotation01:30

Kinematic Equations for Rotation

935
In mechanics, when one observes a rigid body in rotational motion with constant angular acceleration, it is possible to establish equations for its rotational kinematics. This process resembles how linear kinematics are dealt with in simpler motion studies.
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
935
Kinetic Energy for a Rigid Body01:13

Kinetic Energy for a Rigid Body

567
Imagine a solid object involved in a general planar movement, with its center of mass pinpointed at a spot labeled G. The object's kinetic energy relative to an arbitrary point A can be quantified for each of its particles - the ith particle in this case. This measurement is achieved through the employment of the relative velocity definition. The position vector, known as rA, extends from point A to the mass element i.
567

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Constructing characteristic signals of head acceleration events in stock car racing.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
Same author

The Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of a Smartphone-Based Markerless System.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

The effects of an extemporaneous speech dual-task on center of pressure displacement and velocity in older adults.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Predicting elbow valgus torque from upper extremity baseball pitching kinematics using markerless motion capture.

Sports medicine and health science·2026
Same author

Sex Differences in the Relationship Between Hand and Leg Dominance and Knee Osteoarthritis Laterality.

Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances·2026
Same author

Head acceleration event frequency among drivers across track types in Stock Car Auto Racing.

Traffic injury prevention·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step
07:19

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step

Published on: June 16, 2021

3.2K

KINEMATIC AND KINETIC VARIABLES DIFFER BETWEEN KETTLEBELL SWING STYLES.

Garrett S Bullock1, Abigail C Schmitt2, Jason M Shutt3

  • 1Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
|June 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Kettlebell and indian club swings show similar joint angles but differ in kinetic demands. The overhead kettlebell swing has a longer cycle time, highlighting unique training adaptations for strength and power development.

Keywords:
Kettlebell trainingpowerresistance trainingstrength

More Related Videos

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.4K
Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
08:45

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Published on: March 28, 2018

11.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 1, 2026

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step
07:19

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step

Published on: June 16, 2021

3.2K
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

17.4K
Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments
08:45

Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments

Published on: March 28, 2018

11.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Exercise Physiology
  • Sports Science

Background:

  • Kettlebell (KB) and Indian club swings (ICS) are utilized for strength and power development.
  • It's proposed that various swing techniques can be used interchangeably for similar training adaptations.
  • This study investigated the biomechanical differences between different swing types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the kinematics and kinetics of the shoulder height kettlebell swing (SKS), overhead kettlebell swing (OKS), and ICS.
  • To test the hypothesis that peak joint angles would not differ between swing types.
  • To test the hypothesis that OKS would have a greater cycle time and vertical impulse than SKS and ICS.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional cohort study involving 15 healthy subjects.
  • 3D biomechanical analysis was used to collect kinematic and kinetic data.
  • Subjects performed SKS, OKS, and ICS with standardized equipment and loads, with lower extremity sagittal plane data analyzed.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were found in peak joint angles between the SKS, OKS, and ICS.
  • The OKS exhibited a 34% longer cycle time compared to SKS and ICS.
  • Higher ankle and hip joint moments and peak vertical ground reaction forces were observed in SKS and OKS compared to ICS.

Conclusions:

  • While kinematically similar, the distinct kinetic demands of SKS, OKS, and ICS are crucial.
  • The choice of swing exercise may influence specific strength and power training outcomes.
  • Understanding these biomechanical differences aids in selecting appropriate training modalities.