Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

1.5K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.5K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.5K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

8.8K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
8.8K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.2K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.2K
Residuals and Least-Squares Property01:11

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

9.7K
The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
9.7K
Goodness-of-Fit Test01:16

Goodness-of-Fit Test

9.3K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
9.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metastable dynamical computing with energy landscapes: A primer.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Way More than the Sum of Their Parts: From Statistical to Structural Mixtures.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Unsupervised discovery of extreme weather events using universal representations of emergent organization.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Intrinsic and Measured Information in Separable Quantum Processes.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Controlled erasure as a building block for universal thermodynamically robust superconducting computing.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Learning entropy production from underdamped Langevin trajectories.

Physical review. E·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.4K

Nearly maximally predictive features and their dimensions.

Sarah E Marzen1,2, James P Crutchfield3

  • 1Physics of Living Systems Group, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.

Physical Review. E
|June 17, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting stochastic processes requires identifying key features. This study bounds the number and cost of "nearly maximally predictive features," showing mixed-state features outperform traditional Markov models.

More Related Videos

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.8K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 28, 2026

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.4K
Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework
06:19

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

2.8K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Data analysis and machine learning
  • Stochastic processes and time series analysis
  • Information theory and fractal geometry

Background:

  • Scientific explanation relies on identifying predictive features from data.
  • Finding the minimal set of maximally predictive features for stochastic processes is often mathematically intractable.
  • Compromises are made by seeking nearly maximally predictive features.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive upper bounds on the scaling rates of nearly maximally predictive features.
  • To connect these rates to the fractal dimensions of a process' mixed-state distribution.
  • To evaluate the predictive capabilities of mixed-state features against traditional finite-order Markov models.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of theoretical upper bounds on feature scaling.
  • Analysis of the relationship between feature rates and fractal dimensions.
  • Comparative analysis of predictive performance.

Main Results:

  • The number and coding cost of nearly maximally predictive features scale with desired predictive power at rates determined by fractal dimensions.
  • Upper bounds on these scaling rates were mathematically derived.
  • Mixed-state predictive features demonstrate potential for significant improvement over traditional models.

Conclusions:

  • Fractal dimensions of mixed-state distributions govern the efficiency of feature selection in stochastic processes.
  • Widely used finite-order Markov models may be inadequate predictors due to limitations in capturing mixed-state dynamics.
  • Mixed-state predictive features offer a more robust and potentially superior approach for scientific explanation and prediction.