Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 28, 2026
05:49
Author Spotlight: Studying Host-Virus Interactions with Pseudotyped Viruses
Published on: November 21, 2023
2.6K
Science denial as a form of pseudoscience.
1Department of Philosophy and History, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Brinellvägen 32, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|June 21, 2017
Summary
Science denialism, a form of pseudoscience, threatens humanity. This study identifies its unique traits, like fabricated controversies and political links, to guide scientific responses.
Area of Science:
- Science and Pseudoscience Demarcation
- Sociology of Science
- Public Understanding of Science
Background:
- Science denialism presents a significant risk to public health and global sustainability.
- Discussions on science denialism often overlook its connections to the broader literature on pseudoscience and demarcation criteria.
- Understanding pseudoscience is crucial for addressing contemporary challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To categorize science denialism within the framework of pseudoscience.
- To analyze the distinguishing characteristics of science denialism compared to other pseudoscientific endeavors.
- To inform effective scientific responses to science denialism.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of prominent science denialism forms (relativity, evolution, climate science).
- Identification of key characteristics differentiating science denialism from other pseudoscience.
- Literature review connecting science denialism, pseudoscience, and demarcation theory.
Main Results:
- Science denialism is proposed as a major form of pseudoscience, alongside pseudotheory promotion.
- Distinctive features include fabricated controversies, male dominance among activists, and links to right-wing politics.
- Science denialists employ deviant criteria of assent to undermine scientific consensus.
Conclusions:
- Science denialism requires specific strategies for scientific engagement, focusing on exposing manufactured debates.
- Recognizing the political and social dimensions of denialism is essential for effective counteraction.
- Addressing science denialism necessitates a robust understanding of its pseudoscientific nature and tactics.
Related Concept Videos
01:32The Scientific Method
273.2K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
273.2K
02:40The Scientific Method
66.3K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.3K
03:50The Scientific Method
69.9K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
69.9K
01:30Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
689
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
689
01:31Confirmation Biases
8.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.5K
01:29Magical Thinking
242
Magical thinking encompasses the belief in assumptions that defy logical reasoning yet appear intuitively convincing. It is a common psychological phenomenon that persists across various cultural and individual contexts. While these assumptions contradict empirical evidence and scientific laws, they often serve meaningful psychological roles in promoting emotional resilience and a sense of control, especially under stress or uncertainty.Thought-Action Fusion and the Law of SimilarityA key...
242