Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response to Hohenlohe et al.

Bridgett M vonHoldt1, James A Cahill2,3, Ilan Gronau4

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

Science Advances
|June 21, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Vertebrate Genomes Project Phase I: A global reference genome resource.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Rapid Derivation of Cloning-Competent Cells from Peripheral Blood Advances Conservation Biobanking.

The Journal of heredity·2026
Same author

Derivation of elephant induced pluripotent stem cells.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of the Black-Footed Cat: Insights into <i>Felis</i>'s Deadliest Predator.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Leveraging Dog Models to Uncover Human Cancer Insights.

Research square·2026
Same author

The Paipu framework enables creation of a large-scale mammalian cancer transcriptomics atlas.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

This study responds to Hohenlohe et al., offering a scientific rebuttal and further insights into the discussed topic. It aims to clarify and advance the ongoing scientific discourse.

Area of Science:

  • Scientific discourse
  • Response to scientific publication

Background:

  • Addressing specific points raised by Hohenlohe et al.
  • Providing a counter-perspective or additional data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refute or clarify aspects of the Hohenlohe et al. paper.
  • To contribute to the scientific understanding of the topic.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and critical analysis.
  • Presentation of alternative interpretations or data.

Main Results:

  • Identification of potential flaws or limitations in the original work.
  • Support for an alternative hypothesis or conclusion.

Conclusions:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The original conclusions of Hohenlohe et al. require re-evaluation.
  • Further research is warranted to fully resolve the discrepancies.