Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 27, 2026
10:10
Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents
Published on: February 15, 2022
2.0K
Limbal rebound tonometry: clinical comparisons and applications
Georgios Bontzos1,2, Michail Agiorgiotakis3, Zoi Kapsala4,3
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. gbontzos@hotmail.gr.
Summary
Limbal rebound tonometry (LRT) offers a reliable method for measuring intraocular pressure, especially when central corneal properties are compromised. This technique shows significant correlation with standard measurements, providing a valuable clinical alternative.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Contact tonometry accuracy can be affected by altered corneal biomechanical properties.
- Conventional methods may be unreliable in specific patient populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of limbal rebound tonometry (LRT) as an alternative to central corneal measurement.
- To assess the correlation between LRT and ocular biometric parameters.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cross-sectional study involving cataract surgery candidates.
- Rebound tonometry (RT) performed on both central cornea (CRT) and limbus/scleral spur (LRT).
- Correlations analyzed with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), and corneal curvature (CC).
Main Results:
- LRT readings demonstrated significant correlation with central RT (CRT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).
- No statistically significant correlations were found between LRT and other examined ocular biometric parameters (AL, CCT, CC).
Conclusions:
- Limbal rebound tonometry (LRT) shows promise as a reliable tool for intraocular pressure measurement.
- LRT may serve as a valuable alternative when conventional tonometry methods are inadequate or unreliable.
