Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Motivation biases behavior but not perception.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Long-term Adaptation in VR: Retention of Altered Sensorimotor Contingencies through Redirected Walking.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

The role of feedback for sensorimotor decisions under risk.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Non-rigid motion: Blowing in the wind.

Current biology : CB·2025
Same author

Flow parsing as causal source separation allows fast and parallel object and self-motion estimation.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Optic flow, a rich source of optic information for harbour seals (Phoca vitulina).

The Journal of experimental biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K

Saccadic suppression during voluntary versus reactive saccades.

Svenja Gremmler1, Markus Lappe2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Münster, Germanymlappe@uni-muenster.de.

Journal of Vision
|July 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Voluntary saccades show stronger visual suppression than reactive saccades, indicating differences in how the brain processes eye movements and visual input during gaze shifts.

More Related Videos

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

7.9K
Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

11.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.6K
Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

7.9K
Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
06:12

Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram

Published on: March 13, 2018

11.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Saccades are rapid eye movements crucial for reorienting gaze.
  • Both voluntary and reactive saccades involve distinct cortical pathways.
  • Massive retinal image motion during saccades is counteracted by saccadic suppression, a decrease in visual sensitivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate differences in saccadic suppression between voluntary and reactive saccades.
  • To explore the role of extraretinal signals in modulating visual sensitivity during saccades.
  • To determine if the underlying mechanisms of saccadic suppression vary for different saccade types.

Main Methods:

  • Measured luminance detection thresholds during voluntary saccades, reactive saccades, and fixation.
  • Compared visual sensitivity across different saccade conditions.
  • Analyzed the timing and strength of visual suppression.

Main Results:

  • Detection thresholds were significantly higher during voluntary saccades compared to reactive saccades.
  • Saccadic suppression was observed to be stronger during voluntary saccades.
  • This suggests a differential impact of extraretinal signals or distinct suppression mechanisms.

Conclusions:

  • Voluntary saccades exhibit enhanced saccadic suppression compared to reactive saccades.
  • This difference may stem from a stronger extraretinal signal or distinct neural processes underlying suppression.
  • Understanding these differences is key to comprehending visual system adaptation during eye movements.