Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
A computational fluid-structure interaction analysis of coronary Y-grafts
Bruno Guerciotti1, Christian Vergara1, Sonia Ippolito2
1MOX, Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milano 20133, Italy.
Insights
Choosing arterial bypass grafts (CABGs) over venous ones may reduce graft failure risk. Computational analysis reveals venous grafts cause more disturbed blood flow and higher wall stress, potentially explaining better long-term arterial graft patency.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Computational Fluid Dynamics
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major global health concern.
- Coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) are a common treatment for stenotic coronary vessels.
- Graft material (arterial vs. venous) impacts restenosis and graft failure rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of arterial versus venous bypass grafts on graft failure risk.
- To understand the biomechanical factors contributing to graft failure in Y-graft configurations.
Main Methods:
- Patient-specific computational fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis was performed.
- Simulations focused on Y-graft configurations comparing arterial and venous bypasses.
- Analysis assessed flow fields and vessel wall stresses at the anastomosis.
Main Results:
- Venous bypass grafts exhibited more disturbed flow fields at the anastomosis compared to arterial grafts.
- Higher stresses were observed in the vessel wall when using venous bypasses.
- These findings correlate with clinical observations of better long-term patency for arterial bypasses.
Conclusions:
- The choice of bypass graft material significantly affects hemodynamic and mechanical environments.
- Disturbed flow and increased wall stress in venous grafts may contribute to higher failure rates.
- Computational FSI analysis provides insights into optimizing CABG procedures for improved long-term outcomes.
Abstract:
Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The stenotic coronary vessels are generally treated with coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs), which can be either arterial (internal mammary artery, radial artery) or venous (saphenous vein). However, the different mechanical properties of the graft can influence the outcome of the procedure in terms of risk of restenosis and subsequent graft failure. In this paper, we perform a computational fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis of patient-specific multiple CABGs (Y-grafts) with the aim of better understanding the influence of the choice of bypass (arterial vs venous) on the risk of graft failure. Our results show that the use of a venous bypass results in a more disturbed flow field at the anastomosis and in higher stresses in the vessel wall with respect to the arterial one. This could explain the better long-term patency of the arterial bypasses experienced in the clinical practice.
More Related Videos
06:18Intravascular Ultrasound Image-Based Finite Element Modeling Approach for Quantifying In Vivo Mechanical Properties of Human Coronary Artery
Published on: December 6, 2024
11:00Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180° Curved Artery Test Section
Published on: July 19, 2016