Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 25, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death: The Need to Go Beyond the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Devi Gopinath1, Otto Costantini2
1Heart and Vascular Center, MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998, USA.
Insights
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification is crucial for deciding on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use. This review examines promising noninvasive electrophysiological markers to improve patient selection for ICDs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Sudden cardiac death (SCD) causes significant mortality, with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) proven effective in high-risk patients.
- Current patient selection for ICDs primarily relies on low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but identifying optimal candidates remains challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review promising noninvasive electrophysiological markers for SCD risk stratification.
- To assess the clinical significance and potential of these markers in improving prophylactic ICD implant efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical trials and studies on electrophysiological markers for SCD risk.
- Analysis of the predictive value and prospective testing of various noninvasive markers.
Main Results:
- Previous ICD trials utilized abnormal electrophysiological studies and low LVEF; newer trials focus on low LVEF alone.
- Several noninvasive electrophysiological markers show association with SCD risk but have yielded inconsistent results or lack prospective validation.
Conclusions:
- Improved noninvasive electrophysiological markers are needed for more precise risk stratification in patients considered for ICDs.
- Further prospective studies are essential to validate these markers and optimize their use in clinical decision-making for SCD prevention.
Abstract:
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for as many as 450,000 deaths yearly in the United States. Over the last 15 years, many clinical trials have established the effectiveness of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in reducing sudden and total mortality in patients with structural heart disease. However, controversy remains about exactly how to identify the patients most likely to benefit from an ICD, as well as those who may safely do without an ICD implant. The first primary prevention ICD trials used an abnormal electrophysiological study in addition to a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as high-risk markers for SCD. More recent ICD trials selected patients based on the presence of a low LVEF alone. Ideally, noninvasive electrophysiological markers that more directly reflect arrhythmia substrates may better identify patients for prophylactic ICD implant. Several of these markers have been associated with the risk of SCD, but all have yielded contradictory outcome results or have not been tested prospectively. This review focuses on the most promising tests to date, their clinical significance, and their possible use to improve efficacy and efficiency of risk stratification for SCD.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
