Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 24, 2026
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Differences in Waiting List Prioritization Preferences of Occupational Therapists, Elderly People, and Persons With
Marie-Hélène Raymond1, Louise Demers2, Debbie Ehrmann Feldman3
1School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Research Center, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Greater Montreal Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Research Centre (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Objective:
To compare the preferences of occupational therapists, elderly people, and adults with disabilities regarding prioritization criteria for occupational therapy waiting lists in home care.
Design:
Discrete choice experiment survey.
Setting:
Survey mailed to occupational therapists working in home care and community-dwelling elderly or disabled persons.
Participants:
A sample (N=714) of home-based occupational therapists (n=241), elderly persons from a bank of research participants (n=226), and adults with physical disabilities recruited through community organizations (n=247).
Interventions:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures:
The dependent variable was whether the referral scenario was prioritized or not in each question. The results were analyzed through logistic regression using conditional logit models.
Results:
Prioritization preferences differed between groups (P<.001). Occupational therapists most strongly prioritized people who had a few falls (odds ratio vs no falls, 48.7), whereas elderly people and adults with disabilities most strongly prioritized people who were unable to enter and exit the home (odds ratio vs no difficulty entering and exiting the home, 30.8 for elderly people and 16.8 for persons with disabilities.) CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the gap between the priorities of home-based occupational therapists and their target clientele. Although further inquiry is needed to inform priority setting, the findings emphasize the importance of public or patient involvement in decisions on waiting list prioritization.
