Do critically ill liver patients experience negative bias? A web-based survey examining doctors opinions to critical
Philip A Berry1, Marcus Peck2, Tom Standley3
1Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, UK.
Objective:
To test the hypothesis that there is negative bias towards escalating levels of care in decompensated cirrhosis, compared with other patient groups.
Design:
An electronic survey containing eight acute clinical scenarios with equivalent physiological derangement, in which respondents were asked to score the degree to which they would advocate for intensive care unit admission on a scale of 1-10. Scenarios included respiratory, haematology, vascular, renal, gastrointestinal, postoperative and hepatological conditions. Follow-up questions examined the reasons why the patient should or should not be transferred, and enquired about ceilings of care, end-of-life decisions, degree of organ support and healthcare financial rationing. 273 doctors responded.
Setting:
Secondary care hospitals in south of England.
Patients:
None involved.
Interventions:
None.
Main Outcome Measures:
Advocacy score (1-10) and subsidiary responses.
Results:
The hepatology patient ranked 4th of 8 with a mean advocacy score of 7.2. There were no significant differences between intensivists and physicians or between grades of seniority. Of those less likely to escalate (score 1-5, n=42), the reasons given were based on unsurvivability or excessive burden of treatment rather than aetiology. One-fifth cited 'lifestyle decision'. 25 (62.5%) respondents not favouring escalation would make the patient DNACPR, 17 (42.5%) would stipulate ward-based care only and a small minority would instigate active palliation. Of those favouring escalation (advocacy score 6-10), 70% (n=122) would consider unlimited organ support. Fifty-four (29.5% of those who answered) said they 'sometimes' or 'frequently' consider resource allocation when making decisions about escalation of care.
Conclusions:
When compared with a variety of acute medical scenarios, doctors did not overly appear to exhibit therapeutic nihilism for patients with decompensated liver disease; however, significant variation in interpretation of the data and management approaches was identified.
Related Concept Videos
Obedience
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
