Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

7.0K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
7.0K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

520
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
520
Goodness-of-Fit Test01:16

Goodness-of-Fit Test

9.3K
The goodness-of-fit test is a type of hypothesis test which determines whether the data "fits" a particular distribution. For example, one may suspect that some anonymous data may fit a binomial distribution. A chi-square test (meaning the distribution for the hypothesis test is chi-square) can be used to determine if there is a fit. The null and alternative hypotheses may be written in sentences or stated as equations or inequalities. The test statistic for a goodness-of-fit test is given as...
9.3K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

8.3K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
8.3K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

8.7K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
8.7K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

3.5K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian Nonparametric Sensitivity Analysis of Multiple Test Procedures Under Dependence.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2025
Same author

A Bayesian Robust IRT Outlier-Detection Model.

Applied psychological measurement·2018
Same author

Informant similarities, twin studies, and the assessment of externalizing behavior: A meta-analysis.

Journal of school psychology·2018
Same author

A Bayesian nonparametric test of significance chasing biases.

Research synthesis methods·2017
Same author

A menu-driven software package of Bayesian nonparametric (and parametric) mixed models for regression analysis and density estimation.

Behavior research methods·2016
Same author

A Bayesian nonparametric meta-analysis model.

Research synthesis methods·2015
Same journal

BAYESIAN MIXED MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING FOR AUDITORY PROCESSING.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

Psychometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

On Bayesian Testing of Additive Conjoint Measurement Axioms Using Synthetic Likelihood.

George Karabatsos1

  • 1University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. gkarabatsos1@gmail.com.

Psychometrika
|August 27, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a new Bayesian approach for testing additive conjoint measurement axioms. The method offers an omnibus test, improving upon prior techniques by assessing the full hierarchy of axioms and accounting for empirical uncertainty.

Keywords:
approximate Bayesian computationaxiom testingconjoint measurement

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator TAPS

Published on: June 3, 2009

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Decision sciences
  • Psychological methods
  • Measurement theory

Background:

  • Additive conjoint measurement is a foundational theory in quantitative psychology and decision sciences.
  • Testing the axioms of this theory, particularly the cancellation axioms, is crucial for validating measurement models.
  • Existing methods face challenges with analytical intractability and do not comprehensively test the axiom hierarchy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel Bayesian method for testing the axioms of additive conjoint measurement.
  • To provide an omnibus test for the entire hierarchy of cancellation axioms, extending beyond double cancellation.
  • To address the analytical intractability and posterior uncertainty inherent in empirical data.

Main Methods:

  • The study employs an importance sampling algorithm for approximate Bayesian inference.
  • A synthetic likelihood approach is utilized to overcome analytical intractability.
  • The method performs likelihood-free inference, suitable for complex measurement problems.

Main Results:

  • The proposed Bayesian method successfully tests the cancellation axioms on a classic survey dataset.
  • Simulated data analysis demonstrates the method's efficacy and robustness.
  • The approach accounts for posterior uncertainty in empirical orderings implied by the axioms.

Conclusions:

  • The new Bayesian method offers a powerful and comprehensive tool for testing additive conjoint measurement axioms.
  • It advances the field by providing a unified test of the axiom hierarchy while managing inherent data uncertainties.
  • This method facilitates more rigorous validation of psychological and decision-making models.