Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
[NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AT THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE]
Mohammed Suki1, Limor Azulai Giter1, Avishay Elis1,2
1The Department of Medicine, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Background:
Most of the data on atrial fibrillation is known from registries including mostly ambulatory patients. Less is known about atrial fibrillation among patients hospitalized at departments of medicine.
Objectives:
To explore the characteristics of atrial fibrillation in patients hospitalized at the departments of medicine, and their management during hospitalization, focusing on anticoagulation treatment.
Methods:
A retrospective study was conducted based on reviewing patient charts at the departments of medicine of a tertiary medical center. Inclusion criteria: patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation hospitalized during a period of 3 months. The following parameters were collected: age, gender, co-morbidities, cause of index admission, mean hemoglobin, platelets and creatinine levels, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores and INR levels; rhythm/rate control strategy, anticoagulation and anti-platelets treatments were documented at admission and discharge.
Results:
The study group consisted of 404 subjects, who had 735 admissions. Mean age was 76±12 years, half were male. The most common co-morbidity was hypertension (73%). Most patients (90%) were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation previous to current admissions, and were at high risk for embolization (CHA2DS2-Vasc ≥3 - 86%) and bleeding (HASBLED ≥ 3 -79%). On admission, in three quarters of the cases patients with established atrial fibrillation were treated by rate control, 45% were not treated by anticoagulants. The therapeutic strategy of rate control or anticoagulation treatment did not change significantly during hospitalization. The rate of anticoagulation treatment did not differ significantly between CHA2DS2-VASc levels. The most predictive parameter for anticoagulants treatment at discharge was previous anticoagulation treatment.
Conclusions:
The effect of hospitalization on atrial fibrillation treatment policy is poor. Future registries of hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation, as well as therapeutic interventions are needed.
Related Concept Videos
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias

