Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Improved Home Blood Pressure Control by CT-guided Ozone-mediated Renal Denervation for Patients with Resistant Hypertension
Published on: June 6, 2025
Individualizing treatment choices in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial
João Pedro Ferreira1,2, John Gregson3, Kévin Duarte1
1Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique, INSERM, F-CRIN INI-CRCT, CHRU de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Insights
Intensive blood pressure treatment lowers cardiovascular events but raises serious adverse events (SAEs). However, the benefits of intensive therapy outweigh the harms for most patients, showing a net clinical benefit.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Individual patient characteristics are crucial for tailoring treatment decisions.
- A personalized approach enhances the selection of patients who will benefit most from interventions.
- The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial revealed that intensive treatment reduced major cardiovascular events but increased serious adverse events (SAEs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the trade-off between treatment efficacy and safety.
- To simultaneously assess individual patient absolute benefit and absolute harm.
- To aid clinicians in making optimal therapeutic choices in daily practice.
Main Methods:
- Multivariable Poisson regression models were employed to identify risk factors for cardiovascular outcomes and SAEs.
- Model estimates were used to calculate individual patient risks for efficacy and safety.
- Model calibration and performance were assessed using c-indices.
Main Results:
- Subclinical cardiovascular disease, number of antihypertensive agents, smoking, age, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and serum creatinine were linked to higher risks of both outcomes.
- Triglycerides, chronic kidney disease, and female sex were associated with specific outcomes.
- Models demonstrated good predictive performance (c-index for safety=0.69, efficacy=0.72), with clear risk gradients observed.
Conclusions:
- Intensified antihypertensive treatment reduces cardiovascular events but increases adverse event risk.
- Despite increased SAEs, intensive therapy offers a net benefit for the majority of patients in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.
- Therapeutic decisions should weigh the significant mortality reduction from efficacy outcomes against the lower mortality associated with safety outcomes.
Background:
Any treatment decision should be tailored to the individual patients' characteristics. A personalized approach aims to help better selecting the patients who are likely to benefit most from a treatment decision. In the systolic blood pressure intervention trial, intensive treatment reduced the rate of major cardiovascular events, but increased the rate of serious adverse events (SAEs).
Objectives:
To assess the trade-off between efficacy and safety to simultaneously quantify an individual patient's absolute benefit and absolute harm, helping clinicians making better therapeutic choices in daily practice.
Methods:
Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to identify independent risk factors for: primary composite cardiovascular outcome and major SAEs = safety. Estimates from the models were used to quantify each individual risk.
Results:
Subclinical cardiovascular disease, number of antihypertensive agents, current smoking, age, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and serum creatinine were associated with increased risk of both primary outcome events and SAEs. Triglycerides were associated with increased primary outcome events only, and chronic kidney disease and female sex with SAEs only. The models were well calibrated and showed good performance (c-index for safety = 0.69 and c-index for efficacy = 0.72). For the primary outcome, there is a steep gradient in risk by fifths of the predicted model and a similar gradient exists for the safety outcome predicted model. Mortality within 1 year of an efficacy outcome (as assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method) was nearly three-fold higher than following a safety outcome (21.9 vs. 7.5%). If one judges the clinical importance of efficacy and safety outcomes based on their 1-year mortality, then there is a net benefit of intensive therapy for almost all patients.
Conclusion:
Antihypertensive treatment intensification is associated with lower cardiovascular event rates; however, it increases the risk of adverse events. However, having adverse events has less weight when it comes to therapeutic decisions and antihypertensive therapy intensification is beneficial for the great majority of patients included in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial.
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:
