Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 23, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
Published on: April 29, 2014
Comparison of initial patient setup accuracy between surface imaging and three point localization: A retrospective
Dennis N Stanley1, Kristen A McConnell1, Neil Kirby1
1Radiation Oncology - Medical Physics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Surface imaging systems like C-RAD CatalystHD significantly reduce patient positioning corrections compared to traditional tattoos. This advancement in radiation therapy improves accuracy and may be preferable for patient setup.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Imaging
- Patient Positioning
Background:
- Traditional patient positioning in radiation therapy relies on subcutaneous tattoos for alignment.
- These tattoos can deviate, leading to inaccuracies in patient setup and requiring image-guided corrections.
- Surface-based imaging offers an alternative by using the entire skin surface for positioning verification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To retrospectively compare the accuracy of patient positioning using surface imaging (C-RAD CatalystHD) versus traditional tattoos.
- To evaluate the magnitude of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based 3D corrections required for each positioning method.
Main Methods:
- A total of 6000 individual radiation therapy fractions were analyzed.
- Patient positioning data from both tattoo-based and C-RAD CatalystHD surface imaging methods were compared.
- Four treatment sites were evaluated: pelvis/lower extremities, abdomen, chest/upper extremities, and breast.
- Statistical analysis used a paired sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P < 0.01).
Main Results:
- Patients positioned with C-RAD CatalystHD required significantly smaller average 3D shift corrections across all evaluated sites compared to those positioned with tattoos.
- Average 3D shift magnitudes for tattoos ranged from 0.9 ± 0.4 cm to 1.4 ± 0.7 cm.
- Average 3D shift magnitudes for CatalystHD ranged from 0.5 ± 0.3 cm to 0.6 ± 0.3 cm.
- Statistically significant differences (P < 0.01) in 3D shifts were observed for all treatment sites.
Conclusions:
- Surface imaging systems, such as C-RAD CatalystHD, result in significantly smaller patient positioning corrections than traditional subcutaneous tattoos.
- Surface-based imaging is a viable and potentially preferable alternative for initial patient setup in radiation therapy.
- This technology may offer improved accuracy and efficiency in radiation treatment delivery.
More Related Videos
10:25Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
Published on: September 2, 2025
05:49Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024