Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrative Analysis Reveals BPTF, COL1A1, and COL4A2 as Fibroblast-Related Biomarkers Associated with Immune Infiltration in Ovarian Cancer.

Current medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Deep learning models for predicting opaque bubble layer morphology of keratorefractive lenticule extraction before laser scanning.

Advances in ophthalmology practice and research·2026
Same author

Risk of Long-Term Clozapine Medication over Decades for Cardiac Adverse Events Including Heart Failure and Its Pathophysiology: A Japan and China Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Effective Gaussian Management for High-fidelity Scene Reconstruction.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Intraoperative Noise Isolation as an Opioid-Sparing Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses·2026
Same author

Electroacupuncture alleviates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting and inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated cardiomyocyte pyroptosis via serum exosomal miR-22-3p.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Preparation and Testing of Impedance-based Fluidic Biochips with RTgill-W1 Cells for Rapid Evaluation of Drinking Water Samples for Toxicity
11:19

Preparation and Testing of Impedance-based Fluidic Biochips with RTgill-W1 Cells for Rapid Evaluation of Drinking Water Samples for Toxicity

Published on: March 7, 2016

9.5K

Microbial Fuels Cell-Based Biosensor for Toxicity Detection: A Review.

Tuoyu Zhou1, Huawen Han2, Pu Liu3

  • 1Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Tianshui South Road #222, Lanzhou 730000, China. zhouty2016@lzu.edu.cn.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 29, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Microbial fuel cell (MFC)-based biosensors offer a sustainable and cost-effective method for detecting toxic compounds in real-time. Enhancing their sensitivity is key for widespread application in environmental monitoring.

Keywords:
MFCapplicationbiosensorsenvironmental monitoringtoxicity detection

More Related Videos

Waste Water Derived Electroactive Microbial Biofilms: Growth, Maintenance, and Basic Characterization
11:58

Waste Water Derived Electroactive Microbial Biofilms: Growth, Maintenance, and Basic Characterization

Published on: December 29, 2013

14.2K
Experimental Protocol for Detecting Cyanobacteria in Liquid and Solid Samples with an Antibody Microarray Chip
10:57

Experimental Protocol for Detecting Cyanobacteria in Liquid and Solid Samples with an Antibody Microarray Chip

Published on: February 7, 2017

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Preparation and Testing of Impedance-based Fluidic Biochips with RTgill-W1 Cells for Rapid Evaluation of Drinking Water Samples for Toxicity
11:19

Preparation and Testing of Impedance-based Fluidic Biochips with RTgill-W1 Cells for Rapid Evaluation of Drinking Water Samples for Toxicity

Published on: March 7, 2016

9.5K
Waste Water Derived Electroactive Microbial Biofilms: Growth, Maintenance, and Basic Characterization
11:58

Waste Water Derived Electroactive Microbial Biofilms: Growth, Maintenance, and Basic Characterization

Published on: December 29, 2013

14.2K
Experimental Protocol for Detecting Cyanobacteria in Liquid and Solid Samples with an Antibody Microarray Chip
10:57

Experimental Protocol for Detecting Cyanobacteria in Liquid and Solid Samples with an Antibody Microarray Chip

Published on: February 7, 2017

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Rapid detection of toxic compounds is crucial for environmental quality monitoring.
  • Existing methods are often time-consuming, inaccurate, or impractical.
  • Microbial fuel cell (MFC)-based biosensors offer a sustainable and cost-effective alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the potential of MFC-based biosensors for toxic compound detection.
  • To highlight the advantages of single-strain MFC biosensors.
  • To identify limitations and areas for improvement, particularly sensitivity.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on MFC-based biosensors.
  • Analysis of MFC principles for substrate-dependent voltage generation.
  • Comparison of bacterial consortia versus single strains in MFC biosensors.

Main Results:

  • MFC-based biosensors can detect various toxic compounds, including heavy metals and organic pollutants.
  • Single-strain MFC biosensors offer improved selectivity and stability.
  • A key limitation is the detection range often exceeding actual pollution levels.

Conclusions:

  • MFC-based biosensors show promise for real-time, cost-effective toxic compound detection.
  • Improving sensor sensitivity is critical for practical environmental monitoring applications.
  • Further research into single-strain MFC biosensors could enhance their utility.