Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

09:09
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
912
Effects of ejective stops on preceding vowel duration
1Department of Linguistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|November 3, 2017
Summary
Vowel duration in Georgian is significantly affected by the laryngeal features of following stops, even when controlling for closure and voice onset time (VOT). These findings challenge some existing phonetic theories.
Area of Science:
- Linguistic Phonetics
- Experimental Phonetics
- Phonology
Background:
- Vowels are generally longer before voiced than voiceless obstruents.
- The precise phonetic causes for this vowel duration difference remain debated.
- Ejective stops, a third laryngeal feature, have not been studied in this context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate vowel duration differences before voiced, ejective, and voiceless aspirated stops in Georgian.
- To simultaneously model the effects of stop closure duration and voice onset time (VOT) on preceding vowel duration.
- To test competing hypotheses explaining vowel duration variations.
Main Methods:
- Experimental measurement of vowel duration preceding stops in Georgian.
- Analysis of closure duration and voice onset time (VOT) for voiced, ejective, and voiceless aspirated stops.
- Statistical modeling to assess the independent effects of laryngeal features, closure, and VOT.
Main Results:
- Vowels exhibit significantly different durations before all three stop types (voiced, ejective, voiceless aspirated).
- These differences persist even after controlling for closure duration and VOT.
- Vowel duration is inversely correlated with both closure duration and VOT.
Conclusions:
- Laryngeal gestures, temporal compensation, and closure velocity are supported as factors influencing vowel duration.
- Perceptual and airflow expenditure explanations for vowel duration differences are weakened by the findings.
- The study provides crucial data on ejective stops and their impact on preceding vowel length.
Related Concept Videos
Echo
1.0K
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
1.0K
E2 Reaction: Kinetics and Mechanism
12.7K
SN2 substitutions and E2 eliminations of alkyl halides proceed via a concerted pathway. While the nucleophile attacks the alpha carbon in SN2 reactions, it functions as a strong base and abstracts a beta hydrogen in the E2 mechanism. The rate-limiting transition state in E2 elimination reactions is characterized by partially broken carbon–hydrogen and carbon–halogen bonds and a partially formed pi bond between the alpha and beta carbons. The beta hydrogen and halide are eliminated...
12.7K
Beats
1.5K
The study of music provides many examples of the superposition of waves and the constructive and destructive interference that occurs. Very few examples of music being performed consist of a single source playing a single frequency for an extended period of time. A single frequency of sound for an extended period might be monotonous to the point of irritation, similar to the unwanted drone of an aircraft engine or a loud fan. Music is pleasant and exciting due to mixing the changing frequencies...
1.5K
Interference: Path Lengths
2.3K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.3K
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
792
Double resonance techniques in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy involve the simultaneous application of two different frequencies or radiofrequency pulses to manipulate and observe two distinct nuclear spins. One important application of double resonance is spin decoupling, which selectively suppresses coupling with one type of nucleus while observing the NMR signal from another nucleus, simplifying the spectrum and enhancing resolution.
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
792
Limits with Oscillating Discontinuities
504
An oscillating discontinuity is a type of discontinuity in which a function’s values fluctuate infinitely often as the input approaches a particular point. Unlike jump discontinuities, where the function suddenly shifts between two values, or infinite discontinuities, where the function diverges without bound, an oscillating discontinuity arises from rapid back-and-forth variation. Because the function never stabilizes toward a single value, no finite limit exists at that point.One of the...
504

