Asymmetric high-contrast masking in S cone increment and decrement pathways
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 19, 2026

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
Scott H Gabree1, Timothy G Shepard1, Rhea T Eskew1
1Department of Psychology, 125-NI, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abstract:
Physiological, anatomical, and psychophysical evidence points to important differences between visual processing of short-wave cone increments and decrement (S+ and S-) stimuli. The present study uses the pedestal discrimination paradigm to investigate potential differences, using S+ and S- tests presented on (L)ong-wave, (M)edium-wave, S, L+M, L-M, and achromatic pedestals, of both contrast polarities. Results show that high contrast 'purplish' (S+ or -(L+M)) pedestals produce substantially more masking of both S+ and S- tests than 'yellowish' (S- or +(L+M)) pedestals do. The other pedestals produce no masking. These findings suggest greater nonlinearity - either a static nonlinearity or contrast gain control - in the mechanisms responsible for the 'purplish' polarity, likely the S ON pathway.
More Related Videos
06:25Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
Published on: February 23, 2024
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
The Retina
Anatomy of the Eyeball
Color Vision
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...