Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Corporeal reconstruction procedures for complicated penile implants.

I J Fishman1

  • 1Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

The Urologic Clinics of North America
|February 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Penile prosthesis implantation is common for erectile impotence. Severe cases require corporeal reconstruction, demanding urologists master advanced diagnostic and surgical techniques for better patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Efficacy and safety of transurethral alprostadil in patients with erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy.

The Journal of urology·1998
Same author

Evaluation of erectile dysfunction and sleep-related erections.

Journal of psychosomatic research·1997
Same author

Pregnancy in patients with the artificial urinary sphincter.

The Journal of urology·1993
Same author

Simple technique for acute management of urethral hemorrhage.

Urology·1992
Same author

Venous leaks: anatomical and physiological observations.

The Journal of urology·1991

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Andrology
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Penile prosthesis implantation is a standard treatment for organic erectile impotence.
  • Standard procedures typically involve minimal or no corporeal reconstruction.
  • Complex cases, including those with prior prosthesis infection or postpriapism fibrosis, necessitate advanced surgical considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of corporeal reconstruction in specific penile prosthesis implantation scenarios.
  • To emphasize the need for urologists to be proficient in diagnostic and surgical techniques for corporeal reconstruction.
  • To address the challenges posed by severe pathologic processes affecting the corpus cavernosum.

Main Methods:

  • Review of diagnostic modalities for assessing corporeal damage.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of surgical techniques applicable to corporeal reconstruction during penile prosthesis surgery.
  • Case study review of complex implantation scenarios requiring reconstruction.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful corporeal reconstruction can restore erectile function in cases with significant corporeal damage.
    • Advanced diagnostic imaging is crucial for identifying the extent of pathologic processes.
    • Specialized surgical approaches are effective in managing conditions like infective corporitis and fibrosis.

    Conclusions:

    • Corporeal reconstruction is a vital component in managing complex erectile impotence cases requiring penile prosthesis.
    • Urologists must possess expertise in both diagnosis and surgical techniques for corporeal reconstruction.
    • Improved patient outcomes are achievable through mastery of these advanced surgical procedures.