Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

14:14
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
6.4K
There's no team in I: How observers perceive individual creativity in a team setting
Min B Kay1, Devon Proudfoot2, Richard P Larrick1
1Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.
The Journal of Applied Psychology
|November 28, 2017
Summary
Observers often overlook team contributions, overattributing creativity to individuals. This fundamental attribution error in assessing team creativity can negatively impact organizations by misjudging individual creative potential.
Area of Science:
- Organizational behavior
- Social psychology
- Creativity studies
Background:
- Creativity is vital for organizational innovation.
- Teamwork is central to most creative endeavors.
- Understanding perception of team creativity is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate how observers attribute creative ability to individuals within creative teams.
- Examine the impact of visual salience on perceived individual creativity.
- Analyze the role of the fundamental attribution error in assessing team creativity.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments were conducted.
- A pilot study examined perceptions within a design team context.
- Studies 1 and 2 used manager samples to replicate and extend findings, manipulating visual depiction of team members.
Main Results:
- Individuals depicted alone were perceived as more creative than when shown with their team.
- This effect occurred for both creative and uncreative group outputs.
- Observers systematically discounted group contributions, committing the fundamental attribution error.
Conclusions:
- Overattributing individual creative ability can lead to inaccurate assessments.
- Misjudging creativity within teams may have long-term negative consequences for organizations.
- Highlighting team dynamics is essential for accurate creativity evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Individuals on a Group
357
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
357
Social Loafing
39.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.8K
Creative Thinking
1.4K
Creative thinking encompasses innovative and unconventional methods for addressing challenges, often leading to groundbreaking solutions. Instead of focusing solely on enhancing existing systems, such as increasing smartphone battery capacity, creative thinking might inspire advancements like energy-efficient batteries or processors that minimize power consumption. This multidimensional approach underscores the importance of exploring novel pathways to innovation.
Divergent thinking is the...
Divergent thinking is the...
1.4K
Social Facilitation
36.6K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.6K
Actor-Observer Effect
421
The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in...
421
Naturalistic Observations
17.7K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.7K

