Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.1K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.1K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.4K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.4K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

434
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
434
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

4.0K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.0K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

233
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
233

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating diagnostic precision in applying the 2017 periodontal disease framework: A Canadian study across training levels.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same author

Statistical errors and reporting deficiencies in clinical prosthodontic publications, 2019-2024.

Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists·2026
Same author

An interprofessional model of care for oral health during pregnancy.

Journal of interprofessional care·2022
Same author

Pregnant women's perspectives on integrating preventive oral health in prenatal care.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2021
Same author

When I say … validity argument.

Medical education·2018
Same journal

When what we can count is all that counts.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

Reframing interprofessional competencies through Ubuntu: A decolonial proposal.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

Uncovering the economic costs of rotation in postgraduate clinical training: A UK case study using a novel methodology.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

The professional identity formation of undergraduate and postgraduate medical students: An umbrella review.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

'Place' and clinical reasoning development in context: An ethnographic case study.

Medical teacher·2026
Same journal

Fit for context: Faculty perspectives on mentorship and culture in Sub-saharan Africa.

Medical teacher·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.4K

Creating a test blueprint for a progress testing program: A paired-comparisons approach.

HsingChi von Bergmann1, Ruth A Childs2

  • 1a Education Research, Co-Chair of CTEC Assessment and Ed-Tech Subcommittee, Faculty of Dentistry , University of British Columbia , British Columbia , Canada.

Medical Teacher
|November 28, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Developing effective test blueprints relies on expert judgment. This study presents a method for eliciting and combining content expert judgments to create valid test blueprints across disciplines.

More Related Videos

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

3.4K
A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychometrics
  • Test Development

Background:

  • Test blueprints are essential for ensuring the validity of assessments.
  • Expert judgment is crucial for defining blueprint categories and their weights.
  • Effective methods for eliciting and combining expert input are vital for high-quality blueprints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and demonstrate a method for eliciting and combining content expert judgments for test blueprint creation.
  • To refine and confirm blueprint categories and their relative weights through expert consensus.

Main Methods:

  • A workshop involving content experts in dentistry was conducted.
  • Experts discussed, refined, and confirmed categories and their weights.
  • Judgments on category importance were collected anonymously using an audience response system and combined using simple calculation and multidimensional scaling.

Main Results:

  • Content experts successfully produced a set of relative weights for test blueprint categories.
  • Multidimensional scaling revealed a three-dimensional model offering deeper insights into expert judgment basis.

Conclusions:

  • The demonstrated approach effectively elicits and combines expert judgments for test blueprint development.
  • This methodology is applicable across various academic disciplines for creating robust test blueprints.