Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

784
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
784
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

634
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
634
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

621
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
621
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

438
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
438
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

643
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
643
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

439
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
439

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Steroid Maintenance Therapy after Transplantation-Quo Vadis?: Long-Term Prospective Study of Steroid Withdrawal in Kidney and Heart Transplant Recipients. Am J Transplant 5: 720-728, 2005.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2023
Same author

Analysis of de novo donor-specific HLA-DPB1 antibodies in kidney transplantation.

HLA·2021
Same author

Relevance of donor-specific antibody monitoring after kidney transplantation: Findings from the Collaborative Transplant Study and the Heidelberg Transplant Center.

HLA·2019
Same author

Assessing the impact of FoxP3 and Vav1 gene polymorphisms on kidney allograft survival.

HLA·2017
Same author

Pre-transplant soluble CD30 in combination with total DSA but not pre-transplant C1q-DSA predicts antibody-mediated graft loss in presensitized high-risk kidney transplant recipients.

HLA·2016
Same author

Determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches in kidney transplant recipients: recommendations of the German Society for Immunogenetics.

Tissue antigens·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Bioluminescent Monitoring of Graft Survival in an Adoptive Transfer Model of Autoimmune Diabetes in Mice
10:03

Bioluminescent Monitoring of Graft Survival in an Adoptive Transfer Model of Autoimmune Diabetes in Mice

Published on: November 18, 2022

2.3K

Pitfalls in graft survival analysis.

C Unterrainer1, B Döhler1, C Süsal1

  • 1Institute of Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

HLA
|December 9, 2017
PubMed
Summary

Statistical errors in kidney transplantation research can harm patients. This study highlights six common mistakes in statistical analysis and provides guidance on correct methods to improve the reliability of kidney transplant studies.

Keywords:
Cox regressionKaplan-Meier estimatorgraft survival analysiskidney transplantationpitfalls

More Related Videos

Using a Chemical Biopsy for Graft Quality Assessment
05:00

Using a Chemical Biopsy for Graft Quality Assessment

Published on: June 17, 2020

5.7K
A Rat Graft Rejection Model of Intestinal Transplantation with Exteriorized Ileostomy for Longitudinal Prognosis Assessment
08:25

A Rat Graft Rejection Model of Intestinal Transplantation with Exteriorized Ileostomy for Longitudinal Prognosis Assessment

Published on: June 10, 2025

572

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 17, 2026

Bioluminescent Monitoring of Graft Survival in an Adoptive Transfer Model of Autoimmune Diabetes in Mice
10:03

Bioluminescent Monitoring of Graft Survival in an Adoptive Transfer Model of Autoimmune Diabetes in Mice

Published on: November 18, 2022

2.3K
Using a Chemical Biopsy for Graft Quality Assessment
05:00

Using a Chemical Biopsy for Graft Quality Assessment

Published on: June 17, 2020

5.7K
A Rat Graft Rejection Model of Intestinal Transplantation with Exteriorized Ileostomy for Longitudinal Prognosis Assessment
08:25

A Rat Graft Rejection Model of Intestinal Transplantation with Exteriorized Ileostomy for Longitudinal Prognosis Assessment

Published on: June 10, 2025

572

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation Science
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Reliability of scientific research hinges on accurate data analysis.
  • Methodological errors in kidney transplantation publications can lead to incorrect conclusions.
  • Such errors pose risks to patient outcomes and treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and illustrate common statistical errors in kidney transplantation research.
  • To demonstrate the impact of these errors on study conclusions.
  • To provide guidance on avoiding these methodological pitfalls.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from the Collaborative Transplant Study.
  • Identification of six specific examples of erroneous statistical method usage.
  • Comparative analysis of correct versus incorrect statistical approaches.

Main Results:

  • Six distinct examples of statistical inaccuracies in kidney transplantation studies were identified.
  • The potential for erroneous conclusions due to these methods was demonstrated.
  • Corrected methodologies were presented as alternatives.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate statistical analysis is crucial for the integrity of kidney transplantation research.
  • Awareness and correction of common statistical errors can prevent patient harm.
  • Adherence to sound statistical practices enhances the reliability of scientific findings in transplantation.