Blinding in trials of interventional procedures is possible and worthwhile
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 16, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Karolina Wartolowska1,2, David Beard2, Andrew Carr2
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (NDPCHS), Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Abstract:
In this paper, we use evidence from our earlier review of surgical randomised controlled trials with a placebo arm to show that blinding in trials of interventional procedures is feasible. We give examples of ingenious strategies that have been used to simulate the active procedure and to make the placebo control indistinguishable from the active treatment. We discuss why it is important to blind of patients, assessors, and caregivers and what types of bias that may occur in interventional trials. Finally, we describe the benefits of blinding, from the obvious ones such as avoiding bias, as well as less evident benefits such as avoiding patient drop out in the control arm.
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
Blind Procedures
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

